JuniorsCrackDealer@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 10 days agoMaybe there was a cure for human cancer, but it didn't work at all in mice.message-squaremessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down117
arrow-up1307arrow-down1message-squareMaybe there was a cure for human cancer, but it didn't work at all in mice.JuniorsCrackDealer@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square91linkfedilink
minus-squareCredibly_Human@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·9 days agoI mean, there are like dozens of different types of cancers, so we probably have missed some of them.
minus-squareLightfire228@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 days agoimo, there’s no single “cure” for cancer, because it’s not a single disease
minus-squareCredibly_Human@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-29 days agoNot sure why you’ve replied it to my comment which already states there are dozens of cancers and therefore dozens of cures for the dozens of cancers
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 days agoThere is debate on that. There is a mitochondrial model of cancer that unifies cancer into a single mechanic. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00043 This is different from the common somatic mutation theory which views cancer as a bad generic mutation of human DNA
I mean, there are like dozens of different types of cancers, so we probably have missed some of them.
imo, there’s no single “cure” for cancer, because it’s not a single disease
Not sure why you’ve replied it to my comment which already states there are dozens of cancers and therefore dozens of cures for the dozens of cancers
There is debate on that. There is a mitochondrial model of cancer that unifies cancer into a single mechanic. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00043
This is different from the common somatic mutation theory which views cancer as a bad generic mutation of human DNA