“I don’t know anything about it but Lemmy.ml bad”

Is this… Really the bar?

Do you know what a local model is? Because that’s literally what you said…

Pretty fucking low since it’s the gigantic datacenter buildout thats actually doing it. Dumbass

ChatGPT 5.6: (Is fat32 a good option for a 64gb external drive) FAT32 is suitable for a 64 GB external drive only when maximum compatibility is the priority.

The main limitation is that individual files cannot exceed 4 GB. That makes FAT32 unsuitable for large videos, disk images, backups, or many game files.

Better choices:

exFAT: Best general-purpose option for Windows, macOS, Linux, TVs, consoles, and other modern devices. Supports files larger than 4 GB.

NTFS: Better for a Windows-focused drive, permissions, and reliability, but has weaker write support on some non-Windows devices.

ext4: Best for Linux-only use, but Windows and macOS do not support it natively.

FAT32: Use mainly for older hardware, firmware updates, boot media, or devices that specifically require FAT32.

For a normal 64 GB external drive, I would format it as exFAT unless the device you plan to connect it to explicitly requires FAT32.

Local hardware Gemma-4-12b: (Is fat32 a good option for a 64gb external drive) For a 64GB external drive, ExFAT is usually a better choice than FAT32.

Here is why:

The 4GB File Limit

The biggest issue with FAT32 is that a single file cannot exceed 4GB. While a 64GB drive can easily hold many thousands of small documents and photos, modern media files (high-definition videos, disk images, or large installer files) often exceed that limit. If you try to copy a 5GB file onto a FAT32 formatted drive, the copy will fail even though the drive is mostly empty.

The Solution: ExFAT

ExFAT was designed specifically for flash memory (thumb drives, SD cards, external drives). It keeps the high compatibility that makes FAT32 popular — it still works on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and PlayStation — but removes the file size ceiling, allowing files of virtually any size.

Summary Recommendation

• Use ExFAT if you might store large video files, large installers, or want the most modern standard for a drive of this size.
• Use FAT32 only if you require the highest possible compatibility with very old hardware (e.g. a DSLR camera from 15 years ago or a legacy Windows XP machine) and your files will always stay under 4GB.

At that point though cord cutting en-mass was already beginning so it wasn’t even a big draw

Evil for profit AI company fedora

YouTube music is just GPM continued without the ability to upload your own library.

Interface obviously is different but they’ve done good refining it over the years where there’s nothing I really feel like I’m missing compared to GPM.

Also all the music I uploaded back ~13 years ago (damn) is still accessible in YTM

Literally just Lemmy echo chamber shit

Tiny minority very vocal on lemmy

I had the Fold 2 and Fold 4, both broke so I just went back to a Pixel 🤷

Yes, llama-swap and I use it for home assistant text-gen notifications, basic coding tasks, etc

If anyone here self-hosts definitely check out llama-swap as it has some nifty features for hotswapping LLMs, image generation models and voice models.

I don’t understand why you think it’d be out of the question for it to have phenomoligcal experiences, why couldn’t we build a way for it to smell if it has the same pathways to be able to interpret that? How would that be meaningfully different?

Think about hearing aides or other similar “enhancements” wherein were simply adjusting the input in a way and the brain is still able to process it.

I would agree it wouldn’t be the same as a literal human, thinking like Fallout 4 style synths, I consider them people (in universe of course lol) even if they’re not literally humans.

At what point to you would it move from simulation to essentially the same configuration just in a different container?

I still think you’re conflating the aspect of life we experience as somehow separate from the procedure our brain takes to present that to you.

“If you captured and simulated every neuron in the human brain, you’d be left with a feedforward process simulating a particular neural state of a particular person. No feeling, no reflection, no introspection, no semantic meaning. Just a neat toy.”

Seems to me you think there’s something special about humans, I don’t believe there’s any proof to that.

Yes its orders of magnitude more complex then a fly brain, that doesn’t mean it’s impossible to simulate.

There’s no proof to a soul, our whole existence is our meat which evolved naturally over extreme timescales via random forces and natural selection, I see no reason to believe we could not do the same with our intelligence in a much shorter period of time comparatively.

I do agree Chrome was the better browser, hell I switched to it primarily after a few years because of how much faster it was.

I don’t really think that’s the case anymore though, Chrome has been enshittifying for years now, and in my experience, they’re pretty on-par, except of course I can use extensions without the impending doom spectre on Firefox and on mobile.

It definitely happens on my instance, regardless of where the post’s instance is in summit.

Always? Firefox existed before Chrome

Oh I know, it’s just what I see in every thread when some kind of outage or major bug is discovered. Half the comments are hurrdurr probably vibecoded.

A large majority definitely hate it to the point of having blinders on for sure.

On one side you have corpo hype/lies, and the other is LLM is slop garbage and terrible for anything, also developers wrote perfect code before LLMs and now everything that breaks is AI slop caused.

They’re putting copilot in everything, it’s not just github that has copilot lmfao