• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle






  • One of the main complications in the US is the racial mix. Looking at party lines and geographic boundaries is an over simplification

    Say 20% of the population is black, and the state has five reps. Two neighboring cities each have 30% black population, and enough population to have two of the five reps. The rest are dispersed in rural areas. Do you draw that each city gets one rep? Or do you draw such that a district has a majority of black residents, with funny boundaries to accommodate the geography?

    The former means that you will more likely end up with a white representative for both cities and the voice of the black community are not heard in the legislative body. The latter means that you have now gerrymandered to ensure a group gets a voice they deserve.

    This is the real pain in the ass about the whole thing. Some level of drawing stupid districts is needed to create good. Pure geographically created boundaries will only cause segregation if we want minority groups to have an equal voice in the legislature.

    But, people in power tend to fuck everything up.











  • Section 4.2.3.3 of NFPA 704 guides how to handle multiple chemicals.

    You can combine the worst of each category into a composite, list each individually, or do a hybrid option.

    The posts saying there are two chemicals are true but likely incomplete… There are probably several different chemicals and they decided to go with the hybrid method.

    My guess is that they combined the worst rating of everything that doesn’t need special handling, and have a stand alone for the chemical that is incompatible with water (or even combined for several chemicals that are incompatible with water).


  • My personal thoughts are:

    • Close carried interest loop holes
    • Tax loans against unrealized gains on securities and physical property (excluding ones primary residence). You should not be able to take a billion dollar loan out to avoid capital gains taxes. I’m fine that this raises the basis for when the asset is sold. Well, someone do the math if there’s a loophole this creates? But hopefully my intent is clear.
    • Social security and Medicare tax applies to all income. Shares granted as part of compensation should also have social taxes payable on grant.
    • Increase the tax brackets above the current max of 37% for income above $609k… Every 250kish above should increase by 2% until you reach 50% (about 2.5m)

    That money should then be used for:

    • Increasing social security payouts
    • Expanding medicare access
    • Increasing the limits for the tax brackets on the progressive scale for incomes below 250k

    To boost the bottom:

    • Stock buybacks are illegal except for the purposes of distributing stock to employees. This counts for executives but cannot exceed some multiple of their cash salary
    • 20% of money flagged as dividend payments to shareholders should be distributed to employees as profit sharing into their retirement account. There needs to be rules around the max differential between the highest and lowest disbursement.