• ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Where there’s smoke there fire. If there was nothing these cases wouldn’t still be ongoing after years (at least one of them is 2+ years old). It would have been thrown out long ago.

    These are civil suits, not criminal. You’re confusing the two.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s fun that all these comments defending valve are waffling between “it’s not happening”, and " they’re allowed to do it because everyone knows they wrote it in their terms" (they didn’t, but it’s illegal anyway, so wouldn’t matter)

        • DaleGribble88@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          And what does that have to do with the price of eggs in China? And regarding the claim in your parenthesis, wrong again. Limitations on how steam keys can be sold through third party vendors is included in their terms of service very explicitly and it is in no way illegal for them to do so. If they are strong arming companies trying to sell games without steam integrations to be the same price as those with the steam integration, well then that would be illegal and the court case is actively determining if that has occurred.