threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM to SpaceflightMemes@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-220 days agoHank Hill would be proudsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up143arrow-down1imageHank Hill would be proudsh.itjust.worksthreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM to SpaceflightMemes@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-220 days agomessage-square13linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoLess soot than kerosene.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·17 days agoAnd kerosene is clean, because it has less soot than raw oil?
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoRelatively speaking, I suppose it would be. Though rocket engines tend to be pretty delicate, and I’m not aware of any which could stomach stright-up raw oil. Even the “kerosene” used in kerolox engines is a riffled form of kerosene known as RP-1.
Less soot than kerosene.
And kerosene is clean, because it has less soot than raw oil?
Relatively speaking, I suppose it would be. Though rocket engines tend to be pretty delicate, and I’m not aware of any which could stomach stright-up raw oil. Even the “kerosene” used in kerolox engines is a riffled form of kerosene known as RP-1.