• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Exponential improvement is indeed optimistic - a sigmoid curve (plateauing after a period of increase) is much more plausible, though in the computer programming case I haven’t noticed the plateau yet.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Indeed, throughout nature it’s almost all sigmoids. The trick is that sigmoids look exponential before the inflection point and it’s hard to predict when that inflection point is going to come.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Agreed… I’ve been dabbling in “smart” algorithms for 50 years, the recent (last 8-10 years) progress has been dramatically faster than the previous 40, but each new amazing field: voice transcription, language translation, computer vision object recognition, games mastery, have all rather obviously hit sigmoid-like plateaus. LLM agent software writing has been a slow-burn improvement over the past 18 months - from my perspective it seems like it’s still improving, though that also seems to be a combination of the models getting better, their built in instructions getting better, my local “memory” getting better, and me learning what to challenge it with and what’s unrealistic. A big sign for me is: something I challenged it with 12-14 months ago and got basically nowhere, I tried again last month and it’s made solid progress, delivering a lot of features it couldn’t last year - and those are a lot of features I “gave up on” 5-6 years ago, not because they were impossible, but because they were just too much annoying, time consuming work for the value they deliver to me (personally) - and now the barrier to entry for making those things happen in software is dramatically lower.