• ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    For one value, yes…. But for 8 different keys having stupidly low numbers? They either had a seriously faulty RNG, or more likely were hand creating the keys.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      And the only reason to make a key that short is if you were trying to give them to someone who shouldn’t have them, and needed to avoid any sort of digital trail, even copy and paste… so you would obviously just memorize them.

      Memorizing a bunch of 384 bit keys is basically impossible… But memorizing a couple dozen numbers? Child’s play.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          Considering keys like this are usually copied and pasted anywhere they might need to be manually entered… There is zero reason to make them small enough to be human-readable, unless that’s your actual intended use.

            • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 days ago

              Anyone in a position where they are responsible for generating a root key for a certificate authority, 100% knows how to generate a key in their sleep.

              The only explanation is that it was made easy intentionally, not lazily.

      • Corn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        If that’s what they needed, just remember an equation that turns easily remembered numbers into a 384 bit key.