I have been looking at least prototyping in TPU 3D printed dog toys.

  • lordofpolls@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’d be very concerned about the dog toys breaking apart and causing the dog harm.

    I think non-used prototypes would be fine, but nothing that would actually go near the dog

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, it’s not the material, it’s the chewed off bits that I would be worried about. It would help you prototype something, then make a mold that you can use.

      For my dog though, if it doesn’t squeak, it doesn’t exist.

    • Rutty@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I see your point about parts breaking apart being a concern.

      How familiar are you with TPU? It’s quite durable and robust. It’s a plastic currently used in many dog toys. Between that and Part of me feels like TPU being a soft plastic that would minimize risk.

      • lordofpolls@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pretty familiar, I also use it for prototyping. It’s an awesome material, but FDM is no match for a dogs teeth.

        I wouldn’t want to take the risk, peraonally, but I guess it comes down to your level of risk tolerance and if you’re absolutely confident it won’t harm your pet

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        TPU prints are very robust for FDM prints, but dog toys need to be solid objects. Even a small dog will tear apart a printed toy. Layer adhesion is no match for dog teeth.

        Printing a mold and then casting the toy would give much better results.