Because he didn’t know about ISO8601. The only correct date format, especially in Canada.

  • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    My favourite is when you’re reading documentation for an API or an SDK or whatever and the examples show things like “2024-05-05” as the date where they’re both the same number and you can’t discern it at all. Like, use Halloween or Christmas or something as the date so it’s always obvious, eh?

  • mrbn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    "What. No it’s month first,” responded his girlfriend Christine. The couple subsequently got in a huge fight and broke up, meaning their relationship only lasted from 10/01/2023-05/03/2024, with neither knowing if that is 6 months or over a year.

    What a good line 😂

  • Omnificer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I didn’t know it was called ISO8601 but I started naturally using it at work. It removes confusion among international colleagues, makes it way easier to sort data, and is also good for version control of docs.

  • mle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    ISO8601 is great and all, but even without a common standard, I feel it should either be largest to smallest unit, or smallest to largest. YMD or DMY. Anything else is just asking for misunderstandings.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      YMD is the way to go, because it auto-sorts on a computer.

      Even when you tuck on the time, or would you prefer 59:46:13-14:10:2024 :-) ?

      • Hagdos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are computers the most important thing?

        Usually when I read a date I hardly care about year, because most events I read about are within a year

        • PopularUsername@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Leaving aside the problem that you are choosing a date system depending on who is using the dating system and for what purpose, under that condition the most logical would be MM/DD/YYYY, which is truly terrible, so I’m going to politely ignore your argument.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well that throws out DD-MM-YYYY because it’s second smallest, smallest, fourth smallest, third smallest…

    • Hagdos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Care to elaborate? In my part of the world it absolutely is, with only some confusion sometimes caused by American dates