azdle@news.idlestate.org to Rust@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agothings rust shipped without (2015)graydon2.dreamwidth.orgexternal-linkmessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down12
arrow-up131arrow-down1external-linkthings rust shipped without (2015)graydon2.dreamwidth.orgazdle@news.idlestate.org to Rust@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square22linkfedilink
minus-squareNostraDavid@programming.devdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-27 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squaremonogram@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-28 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareTehPers@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoOr both? Functional languages are good to be familiar with, but so is Rust’s strict ownership model. Both lead to better code in all languages.
minus-squarevas@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’s not only the efficiency boost. What about safe concurrency? Or about the tooling - does sbt really compare favorably to cargo? (I’d say “no”, having used both over multiple years)
minus-squaremonogram@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-28 months agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Or both? Functional languages are good to be familiar with, but so is Rust’s strict ownership model. Both lead to better code in all languages.
It’s not only the efficiency boost. What about safe concurrency? Or about the tooling - does sbt really compare favorably to cargo? (I’d say “no”, having used both over multiple years)
deleted by creator