• Scotty@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Does anyone know who created this LLM? I couldn’t find anything about it. Will there be a human being to be held accountable for the decision?

    Maybe it’s just me but this sounds more like “100% bullsh*t” than 100% free of corruption.

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          That doesn’t conflict with 100% bullshit, it only states how the bullshit is split up: 90% just for show, which is annoying, but mostly harmless, and 10% as actual policy. And that’s the bad part.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Wouldn’t that imply that every possible policy is bad? I don’t really think that makes sense.

            Politicians come in every ideological flavour.

            • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              These days, most actual policy is self serving at best, and utterly stupid at worst. The logical result of creating a political caste that has little to no contact to normal people living normal lives.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                The logical result of creating a political caste that has little to no contact to normal people living normal lives.

                The separation between ordinary or even poor people and politicians is actually paper thin. I know, I cross it regularly. The main barrier is just showing up for whatever boring political thing.

                Less boring political events are full of people who love to criticise but clearly have never bothered with the details themselves, so I admit I’m finding this exchange this a little sus.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup. Unless it’s 100% government-run (dataset preparation, model training, fine-tuning, and inference hosting), it’s just adding a corruption middleman.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Went in cautiously optimistic. After all, an LLM that select public tenders to avoid corruption doesn’t seem the worst use case I’ve seen proposed.

    Diella […] has been virtually created by AI

    Yeah, nope. Yet another case of using words without understanding how they go together, tells me all I need to know about their competence and good intentions

  • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The article doesn’t get too specific, but… Wonder how they will deal with malicious actors and tricks like the whole issue in the research world where research papers were found to contain “hidden” text written in white font on white background for peer reviewers who used LLMs to take care of the task.

    I have lost all hope in our future.