• Definetely weird.@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Linux has been ready for the last twenty and I am not afraid to say it. Before moving over, I used to be the biggest Window$ fanboy you could find. I would literally preach at the smallest opportunity available and make everyone in a 10 meters radius around me groan and roll their eyeball so hard they would fall off their skull.

    Then I go and buy a new laptop that I was told didn’t have a pre-installed OS after paying for it. Because I had zero extra money to go and buy a copy of Window$, I ask a coworker to hook me up with something and in the time it took me to go from the store to my job, I had a SUSE Linux disk waiting for me. Back in 2005.

    I unpack the laptop, we boot it to have access to the CD drive and the damn thing starts to boot into an unannounced Window$ Vi$ta. Apparently there was a Window$, unfortunately it was the wrong version, because at this point in time, for me, it was either Window$ XP or nothing. My coworker shows me how to setup up SUSE, which took all of two hours to achieve, including mannually configuring sound and graphics card. The machine is now dual booting.

    Out of morbid curiosity, I play a bit on Vi$ta. It’s slow, clunky, things are not where they should be. The machine burns through the battery in under 2 hours, under conservative energy settings, while under an OS I was previously completely unfamilliar with I feel more at ease, using GNOME as my desktop and the battery management is good enough that those two hours of battery life get stretched closer to three. This is roughly a 50% increase.

    Remember I was this big fanboy? No M$Office, no WinAmp, no WinZip, no nothing. I’m lost. Right? Wrong. With zero effort, I get all the software I require for my daily life and then some. And it comes pre-installed. No need to rely on shady websites to get software. No hassle. No headaches. It just works.

    Fast forward today.

    I have zero machines in my home with Window$. I don’t use it. I still know how to but I don’t. I don’t recommend it. I only advise using FOSS, if the person is a terminal locked-in Window$ user.

    So… Linux is ready.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.eedeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fact is, if my favourite game doesn’t run on Linux, Linux is dead to me.

    Similarly to some software that has no direct alternatives.

    Which sucks.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Linux devs will NEVER suffer kernel level anticheat, so all games that require it will refuse to run. This is more of a problem with gaming industry culture at large, really. But it’s still only going to affect people who use Linux at the end of the day.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.eedeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy. I’d be willing to deal with the downsides of Linux, provided the very core things I do on a PC works. But I have a few things that I have very little wiggle room on.

      • scemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sending personal data to Microsoft to see how famous I can become.

        On Linux I feel really lonely and unwanted.

        • Prandom_returns@lemm.eedeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Great contra-argument to “this doesn’t run on Linux”. Some of you are insufferable.

    • courval@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That wouldn’t be a problem for me if it weren’t for the dual boot issues… I could easily switch to windows when I feel like gaming but no way I’m going to risk bricking my windows installation by installing Linux… Feels like an conspiracy lol when there’s a safe way to dual boot let me know

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.eedeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The real problem for me is that there’s nothing Windows can’t do for me that Linux can. So even with a dual-boot setup I just get too lazy to switch, and end up using Windows exclusively.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          there’s nothing Windows can’t do for me that Linux can

          Linux can keep your data away from Microsoft

              • Prandom_returns@lemm.eedeleted by creator
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                No, YOU cannot. I can, as well as many other people can. You’re just displaying your IT illiteracy.

                • crabArms@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Idk, I think it’s pretty unlikely “many other people” are modifying and using LTSC edition Windows for personal use.

                  Based on your interactions with others, it seems like you’re feeling attacked here, so I don’t necessarily expect a reply but thought I’d ask anyway– What changes have you made to enable what you’re describing?

                • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Please. You have no idea what my IT literacy is. The fact is that unless you install a non-standard edition of Windows, run one of the many questionable debloat scripts, make dozens upon dozens of edits to the registry, disable automatic updates, and block connections at the network/firewall level, then you will absolutely be sending boat loads of data to Microsoft.

                  And the second you do any updates you’ll have to make all the changes again, because Microsoft is notorious for reverting those changes.

                  And, after all that, you still cannot be completely sure that no data is sneaking its way back to Microsoft unless you diligently monitor all network traffic.

                  So I stand by my statement that the one thing Linux absolutely does, that Windows absolutely cannot, is protect your data from Microsoft.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Install Mint. After the updates I tried to install Tailscale. Then proceed to uninstall Linux because I have install using terminal.

    The second I am forced to use terminal, I’m uninstalling.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No friend you don’t get it, if you don’t have to memorise a list of commands in order to be able to execute a program, it’s a shitty OS, trust me friend

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That there’s not a UI showing you the possible options, there’s just a black screen and online documentation, so people don’t even know what to look for

  • Kagu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can someone more plugged in than me show me what I gotta do to get that ‘Discord Wayland sharing’ working? I literally installed Vencord a month ago because every time I tried to share a window or my screen on discord it would hard crash.

  • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I agree with Linus Torvalds. Linux is too fragmented. This makes consistent software deployment and support expensive and far too varied. Maintaining documentation alone requires an unlimited number of distros. From a user’s perspective, I really think Linux needs a universal install method like .exe. No user should ever need to use the CLI install software, no matter their distribution. Radarr, for example, is a very popular home media server application. It is one-click install on Windows. It is fucked on Linux.

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Now all we’re missing is the universal enforcement piece, which I think is non-trivial. It might take off organically but as per my example above, I’m not hopeful.

        • JayDee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Universal enforcement” meaning what? On its face your proposal sounds fundamentally antithetical to what linux is. It’s an open source environment, meaning literally anyone can create software and post it online. Are you wanting all directories to only accept flatpak? I don’t think that would go over well.

          • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You highlight the issue: Linux users like it to be fragmented. So unless Valve forces consolidation, it will stay a mess, and it will continue to repel average users. If that’s what we want, cool. Let’s just stop calling every year the year of Linux, because that will never be the case.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Requirement: let me play the video games I want to play that have anticheat

    A stiff requirement

    • _carmin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They run well on Linux, go complain to the devs who don’t allow them.

  • rovingnothing29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Linux has been ready since 2008. Literally not had a single real problem since Ubuntu 7.10 kept turning my monitor off while booting. Everything just works and has for 17 years now.

    Every problem I see people have now (IRL not online) is ‘I don’t like the default theme’ tier nonsense.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It might be nonsense to you, but that’s the first thing people see. No matter how amazing you business is, if your business card is a handwritten phone number on a piece of toilet paper, nobody will call.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yup. If the theme is causing a mental hang up for laymen, then it’s an issue whether you agree with it or not.

        But I suspect it’s more than that, and Linux stans are playing down the shitty UI.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Thanks to the likes of Proton, gaming on Linux is a hell of a lot better than it was ~5 years ago. You can actually do it now for the most part without to much fuss in my experience as long as you stick to Steam.

    But once you leave Steam or get something brand new made by an EA type and have to lean on third party implementations of Proton or raw Wine to get things working it gets a lot worse.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Lutris is also a great option, actively contributing to it. Got a slightly different focus than Heroic, but a lot more features as well. Basically a one-stop shop once you got familiar with it. Really needs more people that can contribute though given the huge amount of platforms and launchers it attempts to cover (literally all of them).

  • wischi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Linux is ready” - which distro? Fractional (sometimes even non-fractional) scaling is a mess. Most things that go beyond changing the wallpaper image need some command line stuff. Linux Desktop is for nerds and definitely not ready.

    Yes it works fine if you know what you are doing but most people don’t. There is often not one thing of doing stuff, but hundreds. It already starts with the selection of a distro how would a “non-computer-person” decide on a distro. Just try them out? Install twenty different distros because reasons?

    Unless resources are pooled into a single distro to polish it and make a defacto standard for ordinary people, homes and offices, Linux is not ready. If I need the freaking terminal because I want to see the day of the week next to the date it’s not ready.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Do some testing. Put a non-technical Windows or Mac user on Linux for a week. Don’t explain anything to them, so they can figure it out on their own. Let me know how it goes.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          How about a few million school kids on chrome books. My 6YO is AOK.

          Can you open a web browser? Done, Ship it.

          My Parents and my Ex were fine on it 20 years ago. (given back then I HAD to do the setup)

          The only problem they ever had was when my mother bought bargain bin CD full of shareware and I said no, that’s not going to work. She shrugged and I pointed her to some online solitare games.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Then they’re better off with a Chromebook or tablet. The only reason to be on a pc instead is to access all of the additional functions that would be a nightmare for them to figure out on Linux.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The average Steam Deck user does not even know it’s running Linux. How it’s going: millions sold and counting.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Right. Because they’re interacting with an overlay the entire time, so they don’t have to deal with a shitty UI or manually performing any tasks.

            So that’s an irrelevant example.

  • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If the average person can not use your OS, it is not ready. Period.

    For example:

    Windows - Open File Explorer > Add Network Drive > Find/plug it in > Enter creds > Bam. Ready to go and will automatically log you in at boot. Very nice, very intuitive UI.

    Linux - Open Dolphin (or whatever) > Network > Add Network Folder/Find it > Enter creds > Does not automatically mount the drive when booting the computer back up > Must go into fstab to get it to automount > Stop, because that is ridiculous

    In my own experience, I was able to get the hang of Windows with no one showing me how a computer ever worked, at the age of 10! Intuitive enough a child can do it.

    On Linux, you have to read manuals/documentation, ask random (mostly rude) people on the internet, or give up because why the fuck would I want to go and enter 5 commands just to have something as simple as auto mount a network share? Not intuitive, therefore not easy to learn as you go.

    I get it, Linux people like knowing how their computers operate, they like ensuring everything is working the way THEY want to, and that’s awesome! What’s not awesome is recommending Linux to the general populace and then getting upset at them for asking why they can’t do something or why don’t they just do these steps to do whatever it is they are having issues with. Then, you have a person who doesn’t even know what a terminal is confused as hell because they were told Linux is so much better than Windows.

    Until we get a more intuitive (GUI focused) way of doing what I would consider normal computer tasks, it will not ever be ready. That’s just the way I see it.

    • MrPistachios@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      the average person doesnt know how to mount a drive on windows or even what that is or why you would want to, they just need to be able to open a browser

      • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        When I was on help desk I often talked about meeting the client where they were at in their technical skill level. Sometimes their technical skill level was “Can you click the icon in the bottom left that looks like a window with four pains, and then click the settings icon it looks like a gear”. If mounting a file share was involved I just remoted in, none of the people that called could handle those instructions.