Of course! It was probably yet another fearmongering campaign by the “defense” organization NATO 😁

  • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    nah man. russia is known for throwing shit at the wall and sometimes it sticks.

    a few days ago the russian disinfo was “they didn´t manage to shoot them down and they crashed in a field because they were out of fuel. also it was just 3 drones”

    don´t drink the ruzzian disinfo coolaid. we can all hate the west but the russian state is also doing nefarious shit.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      russia is known

      Literally doing the “Source: it is known!” thing without a hint of irony.

      a few days ago the russian disinfo was

      Source? Or is this also “it is known”?

      • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        “the source” is looking at a week of russian state media and how the narratives bend around new facts. there´s just soooo much bullshit i can´t even keep up.

        i just hope you´re either a bot or american, in that case your opinion does not really concern me.

        why do you keep defending an imperialist state? have you ever touched marxist literature?

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Jesus fuck, dude. Who fucking cares what evidence the UK MoD provides. They weren’t the country that had Russian drones flying in and triggering air raid sirens and air defense responses. Cite an article that deals with the Polish MoD.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s neat how you just resort to ad hominem and tribal instance-based attacks instead of actually responding to the critiques that I offer for discussion. I think that says a lot more about what sort of agenda you’re trying to push than you realize.

        .ml has a shitload of tankies (you’re one of them), but I don’t a priori assume that anyone from .ml is a tankie. I make that judgement based upon interactions I have with specific users, and their post histories. You should try a more nuanced style of dialogue and interaction like that on for size.

        • jackeroni@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I have already responded to you plenty of times, you seem to just follow me around a lot and troll. I think that says a lot more about what sort of agenda you’re trying to push than you realize.

          ShitJustFash has a shitload of liberal fascists (you’re one of them), but I don’t a priori assume that anyone from ShitJustFash is a liberal fascist. I make that judgement based upon interactions I have with specific users, and their post histories. You should try a more nuanced style of dialogue and interaction like that on for size.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t really follow you around by intention. I simply sub to a handful of the communities that you tend to spam. And I post challenges to the things you submit in the interest of providing rational, measured, and reasonable counterpoints to your dogmatic stances, so that other users can see that people don’t just passively accept the things you say and the content you post.

            I will add that your pithy aping of my earlier response leaves something to be desired in terms of creativity.