Galactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-27 days agoLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up167arrow-down1external-linkLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comGalactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-27 days agomessage-square6linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
I was curious about your opinions (Not my article). Also this mentions Fossil & Pijul. Which are fully-fledged Git-Alternatives
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down2·7 days agoYou don’t need git alternatives. git has nothing to do with fascistsoft. Please don’t confuse a repo hosting service with the (FOSS) tools used thereon. Alternative for github: codeberg.org
minus-squareKissaki@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 days ago Alternative for github: codeberg.org only for public FOSS
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 days agoPartially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.
You don’t need git alternatives. git has nothing to do with fascistsoft. Please don’t confuse a repo hosting service with the (FOSS) tools used thereon.
Alternative for github: codeberg.org
only for
publicFOSSPartially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.