• invictvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some day someone with a high military rank, in one of the nuclear armed countries (probably the US), will ask an AI play a song from youtube. Then an hour later the world will be in ashes. That’s how the “Judgement day” is going to happen imo. Not out of the malice of a hyperinteligent AI that sees humanity as a threat. Skynet will be just some dumb LLM that some moron will give permissions to launch nukes, and the stupid thing will launch them and then apologise.

    • crank0271@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      “No, you absolutely did not give me permission to do that. I am looking at the logs from a previous step, and I am horrified to see that the command I ran to load the daemon (launchctl) appears to have incorrectly targeted all life on earth…”

    • immutable@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have been into AI Safety since before chat gpt.

      I used to get into these arguments with people that thought we could never lose control of AI because we were smart enough to keep it contained.

      The rise of LLMs have effectively neutered that argument since being even remotely interesting was enough for a vast swath of people to just give it root access to the internet and fall all over themselves inventing competing protocols to empower it to do stuff without our supervision.

      • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The biggest concern I’ve always had since I first became really aware of the potential for AI was that someone would eventually do something stupid with it while thinking they are fully in control despite the whole thing being a black box.