• 0 Posts
  • 56 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2025

help-circle
  • 9bananas@feddit.orgto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneowner rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    25 days ago

    This is myth and legend.

    Mostly it was equipment being destroyed if they destroyed everything.

    ahhhmm…no? at least, that wasn’t the point being made by the workers.

    sabotaging factory equipment was a show of intent: “we are serious about causing damage. this time it’s equipment, next time it’s you!”

    the factory vandalism was a threat.

    if the threat was understood as being serious, and working conditions improved as a result, no further escalation was necessary. that’s why relatively few escalations happened.

    however, A) escalations DID go further on quite a few occasions, and B) the threat preventing the necessity of further escalation was the entire point.

    so, no, it wasn’t “myth and legend”. it worked exactly as intended.

    and it worked, because of the couple of times the threat was not taken seriously. those times made it clear that the threat is real.


  • sure, and that works at small scales and as long as no change is required.

    when either of those two change (large projects where interdependent components become inevitable and frequent updates are necessary) it becomes impossible to use AI for basically anything.

    any change you make then has to be carefully considered and weighed against it’s consequences, which AIs can’t do, because they can’t absorb the context of the entire project.

    look, I’m not saying you can’t use AI, or that AI is entirely useless.

    I’m saying that using AI is the same as any other tool; use it deliberately and for the right job at the right time.

    the big problem, especially in commercial contexts, is people using AI without realizing these limitations, thinking it’s some magical genie that can everything.



  • yeah, no… that’s not at all what i said.

    i didn’t say “AI doesn’t work”, i said it works exactly as expected: producing bullshit.

    i understand perfectly well how to get it to spit out useful information, because i know what i can and cannot ask it about.

    I’d much rather not use it, but it’s pretty much unavoidable now, because of how trash search results have become, specifically for technical subjects.

    what absolutely doesn’t work is asking AI to perform highly specific, production critical configurations on live systems.

    you CAN use it to get general answers to general questions.

    “what’s a common way to do this configuration?” works well enough.

    “fix this config file for me!” doesn’t work, because it has no concept of what that means in your specific context. and no amount of increasingly specific prompts will ever get you there. …unless “there” is an utter clusterfuck, see the OP top of chain (should have been more specific here…) for proof…


  • no, AI just sucks ass with any highly customized environment, like network infrastructure, because it has exactly ZERO capacity for on-the-fly learning.

    it can somewhat pretend to remember something, but most of the time it doesn’t work, and then people are so, so surprised when it spits out the most ridiculous config for a router, because all it did was string together the top answers on stack overflow from a decade ago, stripping out any and all context that makes it make sense, and presents it as a solution that seems plausible, but absolutely isn’t.

    LLMs are literally design to trick people into thinking what they write makes sense.

    they have no concept of actually making sense.

    this is not an exception, or an improper use of the tech.

    it’s an inherent, fundamental flaw.





  • oh, i am VERY interested in this!

    seems like it’d be a very handy tool for modding, since file conversions are usually either done through gimp, if it supports the format, or some random ass tool/website that does only one thing…

    having a swiss army knife type solution would be excellent!

    one point of feedback about the interface:

    anytime there’s a slider, there should also be a direct input field to type into.

    this is to prevent things like UI scaling, or mouse sensitivity preventing proper input…ask me how i know…

    might also be an accessibility thing; for example people with tremors, or generally low dexterity.

    text input is never the wrong choice, but sliders can be!




  • generally, yes, but it’s a couple more now;

    • Austria’s military is moving to open source
    • couple of french cities (was is lyon?)
    • i think denmark?
    • pretty sure there’s a couple others

    point being: it’s a clear trend!

    it’s slow, yes, but it seems to be picking up steam!

    the idea is being seriously discussed at basically all state institutions.

    and more importantly: the reason for this trend is clearly data security. which states actually care about. so there’s a very clear and easy to understand incentive, which makes it politically palatable.

    we’ll have to see, but the trend seems to be heading in the right direction!