Let’s be real , this is apple that we are speaking about… The won’t add a fckin fingerprint scanner on you phone along side the face unlock, will shove through your throats the bugged Vibecoded slop of an os that ios liquid glass is with an eternity of bugs and also the Latest Mac OS Golden Gate, WIL NOT allow you to side load apps or even install one unless they are pain, Will take a fortune of your wallets to even give u a developer certification for the IOS softwares and MOST funny thing of ALL , WILL skip any major updates on hardware let alone their sloppy software after an entire goddarm years wait instead wasting time and revenue over some trivial sht as this patent.

The entire idea of this closed source nature needs to be overcome, don’t think I am some android fan guy as i criticize their latest acts as well , they are following apple as well in their footsteps… At this point…the only thing which I loved the most important thing of Apple, ecosystem integration along with fine tuned software seems to be vanishing…WHY would someone even consider them now? Reason: no one else comes close to them yet … despite all these factors nothing comes close to them…MacOS bs linux isn’t a question yet … because sadly again arm systems of Linux are vastly in development…and their is no perfect widescale foss alternative to ios yet…

But one day we will outgrow them …WE WILL

ScreenGuard is a digital wellbeing software which incorporates the features like monitoring per application usage and total system usage for per day and stores it in a database and also allows you to limit application usage per day or a certain set of application while in focus mode. I started this in early -mid june to make a normal screen time monitoring application to stop myself from over using social media and to know when I need a break. However ever since I have been adding to it , and aim to make this a alternative to digital wellbeing which is present in android.

The commit has been fixed with the correct commit name , i confirmed from my local pc where I do the primary lifting that I had stashed the bug fixes and that was actually supposed to be the first beta commit. Either ways everything addressed HAS been fixed and I am currently adding another commit to both branches immediately with mention of clear ai EXTENT meaning how much ai and which ai was used to do it exactly. To the very TOP OF THE README

Mate i AM NOT near my pc , and am currently replying you back from my phone so yes when I do return, it will be fixed

The last commit is https://github.com/adityakrishnan005-a11y/ScreenGuard/commit/caac2602819adb64a00099a21c0e8160508ca36f

Where as the commit which you must be referring to is the commit https://github.com/adityakrishnan005-a11y/ScreenGuard/commit/fc216df30941f77324d7007d9351a51fbb3624a9 which is latest only in main branch…the latest commit of repository is the one given above… Either ways the issue which you are speaking about , someone else has also stated that, and I have also reasoned the possible cause of the wrong commit name and message…will fix it soon although

That is not the last commit sir , please SWITCH to beta branch Thank you

And about the common issue u say , will it be maintained regularly? I have had only 11 stars on GITHUB honestly…and yet there u can see 2 new beta releases in the beta branch in a difference of about 7-8 days. This is because it’s a project of personal interest and i WILL have to improve it if I want to use it…there is no substitute to this in the community right now i believe and u must know that as well. Also creating the BETA branch and not pushing beta updates to repository IS the correct approach because these are under testing and i am testing it on my own device and VMS but actual devices with defferent environments will be a better test and hence this request.

Pushing to the repository (custom repository of apt and aur ) means that whenever people run sudo dnf upgrade or sudo apt upgrade they get the beta version installed

NOTE: I HAVE MENTIONED THAT THE UPDATES WILL NOT BE PUSHED TO THE CUSTOM APT AND ARCH AND COPR repositories , but you can always have a look at the codebase, just switch to beta branch , both versions are there

Ok improving the extent of llm usage, should have done it from before given my previous experience but thanks and u can go on ahead and confirm that the project is not vibe coded with the code of both the branches, main as well as beta, and the code is fully public sir which part is exactly not public i mean if that part can be cleared I will fix that as well

Currenttly changing the post body here to improve transparency regarding llm usage, i have added it everywhere else.

The initial commit btw is only the initial commit of GitHub , i had been working on this project for a long while and was NOT accustomed to GIT usage much as a result the code base is so huge. Once I brushed up on git i initialise the repository and uploaded the repo publicly. It’s not AI generated sir.

Thank you so much again for pointing out the fatal issues and yes the bug fixes commit u are saying, ok I will look into it and if there is no change in codebase then change it to readme update commit message, but I can assure that there must be some reason I committed that with the bug fixes name , probably I might have left the bug fixes in stash and forgotten to pop it …and commited only the README change by mistake. Once again Thanks a lot

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Please feel free to contribute as this project needs several more improvements and doing it alone is a long tedious process…so if you feel that it’s worth it do contribute as I don’t want to contaminate the code base by using llm for code base and adding any code…it’s the philosophy of this project: AI for basic debugging or assistance only

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod