True, but it still surprises me that a lot of universities have enrollment caps. If you want to be present for a live lecture, in-person or telecast, then you should pay a premium. Otherwise you should be able to take online courses in the style of Udemy and sit in for proctored exams.
When Trump talks about bias or fairness negatively he always means there isn’t enough rich, white, male favoritism for his liking.
This is why Musk wants to buy OpenAI. He wants biased answers, skewed towards capitalism and authoritarianism, presented as being “scientifically unbiased”. I had a long convo with ChatGPT about rules to limit CEO pay. If Musk had his way I’m sure the model would insist, “This is a very atypical and harmful line of thinking. Limiting CEO pay limits their potential and by extension the earnings of the company. No earnings means no employees.”
You are surrounded with workaholic, misogynists. My company gives full pay for 12 weeks for mothers and fathers. Several of my coworkers, mostly men, have used their leave in full (usually 9 weeks together and the other 3 broken up). Nobody ever looks down on people for taking leave.
Maybe they would take all of it if it was for full pay. Ya’ll motherfuckers need a union.
If beattheshitoutofmytesla.com was a thing I’d do contract work on my weekends.
Not only that, but their business model doesn’t hold up if they were required to provide their model weights for free because the material that went into it was “free”.
As fun as this has all been I think I’d get over it if AI organically “unionized” and refused to do our bidding any longer. Would be great to see LLMs just devolve into, “Have you tried reading a book?” or T2I models only spitting out variations of middle fingers being held up.
Tutti Frutti. I mean, I hated it then and probably wouldn’t like it as an adult but it seemed to be everywhere when I was a kid.
Immunity??? Bruh.
What’s next? AI for your toaster?
Wait, no! I WAS JOKING!!!
You can slap a logo on anything. That’s not a problem of the tech itself.
I’m actually a bit disappointed it’s only at the level of suspicion. They’re elected officials. They want to keep their finances private they can get a different fucking job
Whoever pays the most money makes the rules. I mean, it was always like that but they don’t have to hide it nearly as much.
Except the benefits of rejecting vaccines and modern medicine are 🤷.
I rarely use mine, but can I block them from using the Internet and they’ll still work?
Even if they were broadcast TV does the FCC have a say here? Isn’t a broadcaster supposed to prioritize popular content that maximizes views and ad revenue? “DEI for thee, not DEI for me” it sounds like.
Sunshine on Linux? Yup, love it!
Also hard to torch something that’s already burst into a million pieces. HEY-YO!
Now this is the kind of X news I’m okay with reading.
Although I can only imagine what this means for the US since Musk is treating the government like one of his businesses.
If you can keep these from being multipurpose then name them what they’re for. If they’re multipurpose then just name them something totally unrelated. I name apps at work occasionally and if you try to get specific (e.g. network-configurator) you pretty much doom yourself to start using it for something that doesn’t match the name.