I’m a firm believer that hardware must never be linked to any sort of subscription to function. If it does, then it’s because the hardware only serves as a way to access the content, but in that case, it must allow competition between providers for that content.
If I buy something, it’s mine. No one should be allowed to dictate how I use it, I want to be free to do what I want with it.
What the heck are you on about. That’s the worst possible solution to this, are you some sort of masochistic?
If Siri is something that needs to be paid for, don’t bundle it with the system. Charge extra from the start, and people can opt in to that shit.
Also, they run a massively profitable software store, and THAT is what justifies and pays for the bug fixing and security patches to the overall OS.
The “cell a year” practice isn’t to cover development costs, it’s to bring in massive profit by milking the consumeristic herd that buys their crap.
I have embraced the unga bunga lifestyle. There is no stress, the stress is an illusion, there is only hair. Everywhere.
Thank you for the analysis, very insightful!
Do you reckon this is more of an oversight or bug in the BT stack, or a deliberately places backdoor as the title seems to suggest?
Especially writing drivers amirite!
Oh yes. Little Bobby Tables we call him.
Dear sir, may I refer you to my previous rebuttal to the esteemed colleague @dragonfucker@lemmy.nz
I can’t xD
$ cp -r src/ src.old
No sir never seen it in me life, honest to god sir
That’s phrased brilliantly, and capturey my own perception of Musk
12 weeks paternity leave at 85% salary? Damn, that’s sweet, even by many EU standards.
I wouldn’t think twice about taking it.