- 143 Posts
- 485 Comments
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoYou re-read an re-read again. Either be direct or just go away and stop flagulating yourself.
BTW, your nobels in the mail.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoWay to avoid my question for the umpteenth time
What best describes this curve.
Real world data does not behave according to a precieved underlying function. The functions we use are only useful as models. Models are approximations.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoWithout the “knee” of the curve there is no exponential growth.
What best describes this curve
Edit: Maybe I have it wrong. From now on I will only model data as exponential functions because they are potentially exponential and the data set is just incomplete.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoIts all over for me now!
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoWell there it is
it doesn’t suddenly “become” exponential at the rapid increase, it’s exponential the whole time.
What type of growth would you use to describe the advancement of AI?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.1·1 month agoUh, no. That’s too personal. Either you take what im saying at face value or you dont. If there was a time I could sit down and pass a heat and mass transfer exam that is long passed.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.11·1 month agoIts a thing you do to get into higher level classes. Then never think about again.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.11·1 month agoSo your claim is that curve was generated using an exponential function?
I concede, that appears to be the case.
Now this one
What function generated this curve?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.11·1 month agoWhich case is that? Have we moved goal posts or are you claiming this line:
Was generated using the function y=exp(x)?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.11·1 month agoThat’s the curve of the line?
Your data as in you generated it? Or that’s the function that fits the curve shown in the graph?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoThe actual values are exactly as shown on the graph. Do you know what graphs are?
In your data what is the exponential function?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoLet’s start there then. What are the basic properties of exponential functions?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoDoes the data originate from an exponential? Can you prove it?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoBut if it is a linear function it doesnt matter if you only use two points. Unless the function is not linear. If the line isn’t completely smooth you could also use a polynomial function that would fit the curve. Unless it exhibits exponential behavior why would you ever model it as an exponential if linear or polynomial models the data more accurately?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.12·1 month agoDo you accept that if we put together a metric to measure the advancement of AI that it would indicate it is growing over time?
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.13·1 month agoNope. There isn’t an infinite number of linear functions that will fit this curve. Based on the slope and y intercept there is only one linear function. There may be other approximations but only one line of best fit that will predict future outcomes.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.13·1 month agoThe answer is you cant know that’s why it would be crazy to model it that way. With the infinite possible exponential functions that could fit this curve.
You dont have to bring them to court with it for it to be useful. It could be used to target individuals then they use more conventional methods of evidence gathering to arrest.
I would guess they arent currently doing it enmasse because that doesnt sound useful either. I would say, solely on a vibes based level its been done by US intelligence. Its really not so different than a wiretap.