Like getting shanked, then getting in trouble because of the zero tolerance policy (even when the parents brought up the offender before).

Twist: their younger brother grows a better beard.

The line of reasoning that I have is this: there are many artists, entrepreneurs, scientists, etc out there, but few of them have the financial security and connections via their wealthy family to chase those careers that someone like Taylor Swift had growing up. Financial security in this case being a family there for you that can fully support you if your life goes sideways.

The issue that I see when we put people like Taylor Swift on the success pedestal, and they don’t acknowledge the privilege and luck that it took to get there, it feels disingenuous.

Also not pictured: that the mountain is a spiritual site for the local tribes.

You can leave out the NSFW parts. What you’re downloading doesn’t have to be mentioned.

Naw just a Junior that needs guidance.

Based

The kid is five… don’t.

For all the people in this thread talking about the inefficiencies of immutability, they may find this talk by Rich Hickey (the creator of clojure) interesting. Not so much as it shows that they’re wrong, but more so that it’s a good lecture explaining how we can build immutable data structures that address the limitations immutability in a way that reduces the overhead.