But knowing that zoom backgrounds exist, would a properly conscientious philosopher hold a belief on whether it is the real background?
Jaycifer
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: February 3rd, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Jaycifer@piefed.socialto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•[YSK] You will learn much faster if you engage more of your brain at onceEnglish
7·1 month agoVery similar to what my middle school geography teacher told us. It takes consuming knowledge 7 different ways to really cement it into memory.
Sounds crazy to me, but apparently it’s a thing: https://www.bettycrocker.com/recipes/custard-style-mac-and-cheese/6981102f-cb19-4d53-a550-55fe2d1b65ae
My guess is that the eggs are the major difference, probably makes it a little closer to an egg bake in consistency, but I dunno for sure, maybe someone else could speak on it more.
Jaycifer@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.world•Super Bowl Ad for Ring Cameras Touted AI Surveillance NetworkEnglish
9·3 months agoDon’t worry, your neighbor across the street has one!

I’m not debating whether the philosopher is fooled by the background, but whether they would decide they could properly justify holding a belief that you are using a digital background or not in the first place, knowing that digital backgrounds exist. I suppose if they had seen your room in person to know what it looks like, seen one video instance where the digital background had a door open and then you altered the render for the next meeting to have the door shut, that may convince the philosopher to believe that they are looking at actual footage of your background.
But at that point, the philosopher would have a justified false belief that they are looking at your background, rather than the unjustified true belief that it is a digital render of the same background.
This where I stop addressing you directly and start rambling about my feelings on the topic at large. Having read Gettier’s original paper as well as Elizabeth Zagzebski’s On Epistemology which discusses justified true belief (JTB) and feeling strongly enough to get a short paper published on the matter, I think people generally have an unhealthy fear of holding justified false beliefs. In Zagzebski’s book she lays out a few modern attempts to “fix” JTB, and I can’t remember the term for any of them because they all boil down to JTB, but with an extra word affixed to the front that means making sure you really justify your belief. But any attempt to justify your justification is really just a form of justification and therefore already part of the J of JTB. Sometimes you can do everything right and still end up wrong.