Or maybe they didn’t. Check this cross-post comment thread.
I replied there, sourcing the original blog post.
What they said: “Maybe slightly better, not significantly better than existing tools, at least in the context of this single project”. What The Register makes of that: “greatest marketing stunt ever”. They did reference marketing in one sentence, but it was nowhere near as extreme.
It’s a tragedy that there are no sanctions against Israel yet.
The lack of response to uphold international law and human rights reduces confidence in the whole justice system. Prosecution then going after civil activism when state terrorism receives no response but seemingly support is furthermore detrimental.
Amnesty International and others have argued that [Section 129 of the German Criminal Code, which forbids the formation and membership of criminal organizations] is being misused by German prosecutors.
The defense, for its part, told DW that the prosecutors have not proved that “Palestine Action Germany” even exists as a formal organization.
Even if they could be considered a criminal or terrorist organization, if they’re targeting a company that pushes injustice specifically, it’s hard not to have sympathy and, at the same time, lose faith in the justice system/a just system.
If the government had put sanctions in place, this kind of activism wouldn’t be necessary and likely wouldn’t be happening.
Videos posted online appear to show the activists breaking into the Elbit Systems subsidiary offices in the southern city of Ulm, damaging several computers and other technical equipment, and spray-painting slogans on the walls, including “baby killers.” According to the defense, when security personnel on site alerted the police, the activists waited on site to be arrested.
It’s hard to equate this kind of sabotage to terrorism that attacks civilians.
How do you pronounce /?
It’s probably a typo and supposed to be Nanu. In German, nanu is an expression of surprise. This model’s slogan is “Nanu, wo kommt das denn her?” meaning “Huh, where did this come from?”.
I searched for Die Linke Israel and the seemingly most recent press is about against Israel. That seems to be the opposite of what you so strongly claim!?
For a little while now I’ve wanted to ask my representatives why there’s no sanctions on Trump yet, and if any are planned. These new tariffs certainly show appeasement or defusion doesn’t work. All while we’re losing much more in terms of international rule of law and the incoming long term impacts.
They’re probably hesitant/refusing sanctions because we’re so connected to the US, economically and politically. But seeing the US government violate international law and no consequences being taken like against Russian war-connected people is frustrating to see.
I wonder if Trump wouldn’t be more willing to leave Iran if Europe put more pressure on him.
Are they called MrsShankles?
I think if you look towards northern Europe instead of the US you’ll find better references and goals.
This comment scares me
Totally fine. Containerization comes at a cost too. It’s a matter of system design, knowing your risks and complexities, and handling them accordingly.
With such a size, before containerization I’m wondering if these services are not independent enough to split them onto multiple servers.
Having everything together reduce system complexities in some ways, but not in other ways.
Russia’s main demand is no Nato.
This is bullshit. ‘No NATO’ is one of Russia’s many lies, a talking point, a pushed narrative, a lie they used at some point. At the same time, Putin has publicly stated intention of getting control of UDSSR land “back”.
NATO was never an enemy of a collaborative or just Russia. It was only opposition to military action.
Giving in to ‘no Nato’ is giving up on autonomy and on being able to defend, with all its consequences.
Today’s USA under Trump is more of an ally to Russia than not. Trump is actively working for Putin and against Europe. It’s just that the political and systematic environment protects us from worse, for now.
If you’re interested in a counter argumentation/expert analysis of previous posts, The Boy That Cried Mythos: Verification is Collapsing Trust in Anthropic is very critical about the whole press and marketing around Anthropic’s Mythos. (lemmy post link)
I hate this terminologymaxxing, too. /s
a default-disabled prototype
No wonder it didn’t show up in normal/enduser release notes.
This article suggests you have to disabled Enhanced Tracking Protection to test it. Does it replace that entire system with an equivalent system?
I’ll wait until it’s stable and productive.
Which relations specifically do you suggest we rebuild?
The Russia before the recent invasion was a Russia preparing for war. Russia has and had explicit pursued goals of destabilization of Europe and making Europe dependent. and Russia wants its UDSSR land and control back. The US isn’t the problem in that relationship. I certainly don’t want back into that trajectory.
China has its own voiced claims and seekings of foreign territories. They’re fundamentally egoistic and pursuing control and dominance. It was an asymmetric trade, making use of the open European market while having a closed domestic market. They were stealing know-how and then used subsidization to weaken and drive out European competition. I don’t want back onto that relationship and trajectory either.
We need new kinds of relations. And the US doesn’t stand in the way of that. It’s another party we need new kinds of relations with.
What they were saying is in the sentence following the one you quoted.
At least Germany supports the regime change.
Of course, as you point out, they’re making wrong assumptions or deliberately mislead. With that, what they were saying falls apart.
Germany became trustworthy and stable through democratic systems and the rule of law. OP pulling an equivalence to Russia of today is insane.
It’s so stupid in Germany. It was state-owned. Then, privatization and Telekom expanded into other nations. In Germany, it violates net-neutrality, and sends repeated lying, misleading, and pressuring door-to-door marketing. For a premium cost, you don’t get a premium service. Worse, it’s still so big that it affects infrastructure over the whole of Germany. Insane.
Can’t even view the website without accepting the terms of service, titled “The Contract”. Privacy Policy section says provided data is considered public domain.
I don’t think that’s lawful. Certainly doesn’t feel like an inherently trustworthy platform.