Nice, even WebDAV support

It’s about Typescript compiler

I wish I could say “same here”, but the prices are quite different 😥️

And base64 util did become better

I wouldn’t say it is quite simple to do such a quality replacement in Photoshop. I’d argue that people with necessary skill level are rather rare.

The face is wrong

I just wanted to say that at a volume of an Olympic swimming pool of 2500 m³, and a density of plutonium of 19.85 g/cm³, a pool can contain about ridiculous 50,000 tons of plutonium

You guys are having own hostname in hosts file?

the ecosystem seems to have died about 2 years

Yeah, as I said elsewhere, less alive than before

it requires signing up to join the system

I think the point of the standard was that you don’t have to sign up with someone specific.

But in more general terms, of course one has to sign up with some bank or website or wallet that will receive the money or send the money.

AFAIK it was already working, though cumbersome to set up. Then a core enable stopped supporting it, and now it is less alive than before. However I’m not deep into the topic and the last info I got from this article.

There are efforts on a standard called Web Monetization

Framework allows replacing and upgrading screens as the core feature. But for Chad ThinkPad this is a great achievement: “Even the screen is upgradeable with some tricks”.

Built-in on Kagi, with community database

JS just implicitly does what you, typed language developer, would have to do explicitly

Well, you tried to appeal to a common logic, and I appealed to even more common logic. If you arrange 3 apples on a table in an array, and ask anyone to take the 0th apple, they will be confused.

0-based is just a convention, not a law of the universe. Only using integer-type numbers to address array elements is too merely a convention of some programming languages. And note that no one suggests using non-integer numbers here, only numbers of non-integer type.

Obviously, opinions vary here as well

Types are good

Opinions vary on this topic, apparently. There’s a proliferation of untyped languages.

Try interacting with anything that uses u64 and you’ll be a lot less happy!

I’m sorry you had to experience this, but in all my years of development I hadn’t.

…not actually quite as bad… While it’s UB for C, and it can return garbage. … the value it returns is 0x8000

0x8000 is garbage. Insane.

What does it mean to access the 0th element of an array?

Well, I think I’m happy to never have to choose a number type in JS. I also think that insanity is how C and Intel handle NaN conversions.