ovi*

So the keyword to monitor is “HTSC”, got it. I heard Sabine Hossenfelder comment a few papers, but I have no idea about the full body of research.

Wow, that must be the best answer yet, at least from my ignorant point of view about the feasibility. I am extremely fascinated by material science. Are there any promising lines of research for this?

Can you expand on the technology and use cases?

As someone who never managed to work with a graphing calculator, you made me want this.

As I stated, I am more familiar with the articles of the GDPR, nothing more.

I expect a company like Meta to have a EU corporate entity and legal representation in the EU, in which case the charges can be applied to the EU entity and authorities may even seize assets within the Union.

I bring you the example of the Territorial Scope of the GDPR since it is the one I am most acquainted with:

• This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not.
  

• This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to:
  
                the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or
  
                the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.
  

• This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data by a controller not established in the Union, but in a place where Member State law applies by virtue of public international law.
  

Similar articles are there for the AI Act (which got JD Vance to talk shit about the EU on the 11th February) and the Product Liability Directive.

This is the reality we live in. Up to you to accept it or not.

What would be the first 3 tasks to be done under that line item?

My problem with counting all climate change is that the goal itself is not unique: there are atmospheric greenhouse gasses to lower, which are something completely different than the acidification of the oceans, which are completely different from deforestation.

And the effects themselves are, it’s true, all originated from an imbalance in a system, but exactly because climate is a complex system, they differ wildly.

Very interesting, thank you. Keep Lemmy updated on developments!

I agree. Still it is a set with way fewer elements than action against climate change. Also, the nature of operations in the latter case is way more diversified than in the development of the former.

It is only my opinion though, you may find Generative AI a hydra compared to the other.

By the way, the money would be well spent indeed but not even close to enough for a sustainable change.

They are operating in Europe.

Probably the only one that would really change the entire world for the better.

Yes!

We really need this. I am following Ladybird closely.

Love this answer! I wish the EU could move it in as an EU agency.

True, but still only marginally.

I think concrete is still king.

I wrote Generative AI. Do you want to put the two on the same scale of complexity?

Not counting it as a single endeavor.

Why would they then give a shit about complying with ePrivacy and GDPR?