This explanation is a really terrible explanation - it doesn’t even explain the point of the study or what multiple comparisons are in statistics…
This is what the salmon study was saying - if you did a whole brain analysis with fmri without an a priori prediction you need to adopt a radically more stringent threshold for significance
The salmon in the MRI was a bowl with a million jellybeans in it
I only took a cursory glance but a lot of that belongs to the UI framework (svelte)
Similar to react/vue, it’s used to render the content on the page, and automatically update what’s shown on the page when variables change value. This basically replaced jquery and the callback-hell that was mid-2000s web development
Damn you literally drove OP off the deep end
Yarn isn’t a JS runtime
Or just… teach them? play movie.mkv isn’t rocket science.
Instructions on how to switch to HDMI 1 are currently taped to the back of my mom’s TV remote
Things like gradient boosting, supervised + reinforcement learning, NLP (sentiment analysis), etc have been used in algorithmic trading for decades.
Hell, much to the chagrin of statisticians, some people even lump linear regression under the AI umbrella
Also I think you are confusing fundamentals and technicals
Giraffe’s in shambles
Fair - point still stands though - the application only has a single breakpoint defined at 600sp from a cursory glance, the lack of an ultra-wide specific layout is just because it hasn’t been implemented rather than a shortfall of GTK (though I’m not sure you would even want to make the message view wider, as it would impair readability)
That looks like it’s just wrapping a WebView, is it not?
It looks like the CSS is just capping the container class width at 1440px, which has nothing to do with GTK
There are low powered FM transmitters you can get for your car
FM transmitter plugs into cigarette lighter for power
iPod connects to FM transmitter via AUX cord
You tune your cars radio to whatever frequency the transmitter is set to, and it plays whatever your iPod is playing
Ah, yeah it is.
The “sign up to read this article” pop-up on mobile obscures literally everything except the article title and yesterday’s date for me, so I assumed it would have been about yesterday’s Eurovision final lol
Didn’t watch this year, but got the impression this was happening last year as well. Whenever there was ANY mention of Israel by the hosts, the audio became murky, then crystal clear all of a sudden because they had to cut the audience track out completely.
I feel like they must have had a separate room/section mic’d up specially for “Israel applause”
> want to compile 50kb C++ console app on windows
> 6 GB MSVC installation
It’s Google analytics, and the meta/twitter/etc tracking pixels. Almost every site uses them because they provide useful data to the site owner and they are free.
the images in OPs post appear to be designed to match their site theme, meaning umatrix wouldn’t even block them, because they are being served from the sites actual domain/CDN and not from Facebook/Google’s tracking domain.
The buttons don’t do any tracking just from existing. They only exist to encourage a miniscule number of people to repost your content on social media, and in the event a share comes from that, they may include affiliate info
All the useful information comes from the tracking scripts, which developers are also placing themselves because they are infinitely more useful. They tell you where visitors are coming from, how/if they are converting, everything they are viewing/interacting with on your site, and what the ROI of your ad spend is. In addition to telling you if someone clicked the share button.
Tracking pixels have been decoupled from the “share” buttons for at least 10-15 years
Just loading the “share” icon from the social media website allows them to see that you are reading that specific article
The buttons aren’t necessary for this though. They can do that with a <script> tag, or a hidden 1x1 pixel <img>
OP said it was to notify you when an alarm went off, not when it ran out of batteries.
You seem content to entirely gloss over the issue, which isn’t the pros/cons of a particular writing style, it’s that the maintainer could have said ANY of the things you said, but he didn’t
The AGPL license allows the license holder to specify additional terms of the license that require preservation of specified reasonable attributions or legal notices - this is covered in 7B, and the onlyoffice license specifies that the logo must be preserved for attribution.
Assuming a logo legally counts as reasonable attribution (IANAL) that would put only office in the right here, but holy shit, the fact that the license allows these modifications to be put on line #655 rather than line #2 is absurd. I, like most people I assume, only read far enough into the license to figure out whether it’s MIT or GPL