

Maybe they should split the design and the manufacturing. Everyone can throw a design to the table and then choose the best. And then and only then talk about which part is build by which partner.
Maybe they should split the design and the manufacturing. Everyone can throw a design to the table and then choose the best. And then and only then talk about which part is build by which partner.
I’d be a watchdog, not a dictator. I think that’s the better use of that power. And if I had an idea then I’d take it to the same process as the rest of the laws and have a vote on it.
And ogg?
Guess what insurance businesses will do with that. Maybe not all is lost.
Give the operators a product they like even more than Huawei’s and you’ll get the contracts.
FUCK YEAH!
And I, as an European, ask him to kick the bucket ASAP.
Thank you.
Great news for retrocomputing.
In Spain we had Infovia in the 90s, a kind of Spanish internet. Not directly connected to internet.
Let’s see if I get it: Back to the early 90s?
Microsoft wanted a platform… for Windows CE, not Nokia’s MeeGo or Symbian. That was the problem. Elop destroyed Nokia to get the only the name.
Then every office program is a “no-code”. And every program from the user perspective when the user is not coding is a “no-code” 🤷🏻♂️
Not spying other people. Spying the owner of the glasses.