hopesdead

The bigger problem is trying to get the mainstream that would read an article like that to understand the technical difference between hacking and accessing unsecured data.

I don’t know how relevant it is anymore, but I recommend watching the documentary Outfoxed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outfoxed

I read this in the voice of Mr. Witherspoon from Bojack Horseman, which was Stephen Colbert.

Remember when Xbox required a Live subscription to use the any streaming entertainment app?

Howdy.

How is d?

Who is d?

My experience, I have never received a single alert send to me. Seems broke. On my end. Always have to look at the website.

But who is collecting the troll toll?

He’s enter boys hole’s now?

Dude, you should have stopped using Spotify when they let Joe Rogan on their platform… or when they started hosting fake music.

This is why I get upset seeing people who openly participate in the fandom.

Considering he didn’t understand as a child that staring at Bulma naked was not appropriate, I’m not surprised he doesn’t know what a penis is.

EDIT: Yes I read that conversation as the voices of Christopher Sabat and Sean Schemmel.

It was restarted in like the last year.

That is only if they catch fire.

But they sold $43 million in 72 hours! /s

Are they still defending the fact they host Stormfront?

I didn’t read the article. I will admit this. I am only reacting to the headline.

No it isn’t but I still refuse to choose on purpose to listen to that song. I don’t even know the name.

EDIT: Just to be clear, I can’t stop from hearing the song out in the wild. However I will not seek it out. I just do not want to hear a song purposefully made with AI in such a manner. I’m still bitter that LOVE won a Grammy over the soundtrack to Across the Universe. They only gave the award to LOVE because George Martin was involved in it.

Says the dude who completed a song using AI.

deleted by creator

This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.