How come that article doesn’t mention the author(s)?

Just like a band shirt, no?

That’s why my dad bought a sports car

That’s certainly something. Your song will also play at your funeral :)

Big business brain

Bijection or go home

Clay, I can walk 100 meters and dig it out of the ground for free.

Water, it rains about 200 days a year.

I love natural light, but in winter i do close the curtains as my windows are terribly insulated.

It’s possible to have neither freedom nor safety

Water

The first commit on main would be a rough structure of the document.

Then branches for each feature (in your case perhaps “abstract”, “chapter 2: intro” “chapter 2: methodology” “chapter 2: conclusion”), and branches for bugs (in your case perhaps: “proofreading and errata chapter 2”, “correct legend figure 4.2”).

Sounds like a fine usecase for git.

I don’t know the structure of your work, and there is not one correct way to do things.

“Too short” branches would be when you open and merge into main multiple times a day. “Too long” branches would be when one person works on their own branch for months without checking the whole.

In software, before merging into main, it’s customary to have a person other than the author review and (dis)approve the changes.

There’s only the physical, measurable (“form”). The abstract (“formless”) is an approximation we come up with to allow reasoning within our limited brain.

I like dessa from doomtree, jean grae, doechii

You can subscribe to youtube channels with rss, that way you don’t have to log in a d you have a chronological list of uploads of channels you’ve chosen.

How do you know?

I was cleaning my roof gutters, grabbed a handfull of leaves, turned out to be a frog.

deleted by creator

Sopranos

One person’s hero is another person’s asshole