It’s the common legal term now. I am sorry for making you google it though.

That’s just not true, though. This case involves famous people, yes. But the first conviction under the TAKE IT DOWN act, which was passed in May 2025, was only passed down just two months ago in April. It involved no famous people at all. It was an Ohio man who was using AI to make pornographic images of local people in his neighborhood, adults and children, and posting them online on a CSAM promoting site.

Link to related article: https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/columbus-man-first-convicted-take-it-down-act-pleads-guilty-cybercrimes/530-fff42eac-4089-49ce-847b-0597c8a8fe39

Enforcement under this act is just getting the ball rolling. I expect there will be much more news of it soon.

TAKE IT DOWN Act - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAKE_IT_DOWN_Act

“Ok, ok. Everyone calm the fuck down. We haven’t actually released the see-through-clothes-a-vision feature. No consumers have access to it, and it’s not yet been decided that we even will release this tech. We’re just developing and testing this personal x-ray tech to explore the possibilities, that’s all! We think it might have great applications for anatomy education, medical exams and law enforcement.”

“Ah, come on. Don’t get your panties in a wad. Yes yours. I can see them getting all wadded as I speak! Don’t you want to be like Superman, but without any of the moral restraint?”

“Besides you’re not allowed to get mad at us until after we’ve actually unleashed this mass privacy violation tech onto the world. If we do end up unilaterally deciding to irrevocably destroy every semblance of modesty, privacy, and personal descretion for sharing one’s own body, we promise, we’ll be completely transparent about it. As transparent as your dress is to these glasses right now. Wowza!”

Spoiler warning for Windows 12!

Socrates was famously called the ‘gadfly’ because he would pester elites by challenging their supposed wisdom. People that would be highly knowledgeable craftsman, financiers, politicians, etc. would then over estimate their knowledge outside of their realm of expertise and claim to be wise in all things. They would know just enough to sound knowledgeable, but really know very little about what they were talking about (related to the Dunning-Kreuger effect). The takeaway of Socrates’ gadfly work is that sometimes wisdom is acknowledging when you do not know something.

AI can have a lot of “knowledge” (it doesn’t actually know anything itself, but rather has pattern training and access to data references). But what it doesn’t have… like at all… is wisdom. It doesn’t understand, literally, anything at all. It might have some guard rails up to limit is hallucinations. It might even say, sometimes, that it doesn’t know. But it is just as happy to ramble on with pure and complete nonsense that is all just a stream of patterns training and probabilistic guesswork. If it has a nugget of data or even an entire library related to your prompt, it will present it to you. But it can 100% just fill any gaps or take the response into tangents that are nothing but guess-the-next-word, probability, looks-good-to-me word salad that can contain several “facts” that are nothing but random word associations from its training with no reference for its basis.

It is a glorified autocorrect. You cannot trust its information blindly, and using it as a tool in this way, especially while staking your fucking law career on it, is goddamned moronic.

My point boiled down to the fact that someone cannot justify their stance that trans Healthcare isn’t necessary while thinking their cosmetic care is. That those two things are not comparable in either importance or their life-saving outcomes. Again, I’m not reducing trans gender affirming healthcare down to cosmetic care by drawing the comparison to it. The point is that there is no comparison between them beyond the superficial.

I get what you are saying. Certainly many do treat it as cosmetic. And insurance companies will do anything they can get away with to not pay for care, no matter who you are.

My counterpoint is that these people that are getting elective cosmetic treatments and surgeries to affirm their gender expression see that as important for themselves. But there is no way to justify that importance and not see that it is no where near as important to them as actual gender affirming care is to a trans person. To minimize or reject the later while choosing to seek the former is outrageous. That is the kind of hypocrisy that I’m saying can shine a light on the actual importance of trans healthcare.

This is a silly take. The point is not to compare someone to something they hate, as if that is an insult in itself, to propagate their hate. The point also not to say that things that affirm the gender of cis people is the exactly the same as trans care. The point is the hypocrisy. The point is that their hate is baseless and irrational and they often share more in common with those they hate than they will even acknowledge. They don’t have to be hypocrites for their hatred to be irrational bigoted, but when they are, it make it all the more apparent and easily seen as egregious. There is value in highlighting the hypocrisy and those commonalities for them and others to see, and in normalizing things that affirm ones gender identity, cis, trans or otherwise. Why are we pretending that pointing out those things is somehow a microaggression against trans people or a sign of sharing in that bigotry?

For a much less loaded comparative example, If someone made fun of someone for liking comic books while wearing a batman/punisher tee shirt, you aren’t shitting on comic book fans by pointing out the contradiction. Yes, I’m aware that is a reductive comparison. It’s for illustrative purposes, not to reduce the plight of trans people to a hobby. Don’t come at me.

Misuse of the word “racist” aside, if you’re generalizing about the inherent qualities of the Russian people, that’s still bigotry. If you’re calling out negative aspects of their laws, government, or culture, that’s not bigotry, that’s constructive criticism. If you’re pointing out the mistakes of their history that’s education to bring awareness and hoodlums prevent recurrence. If you’re calling all speech that is negative in any way about Russia “russophobia”, or “racism”, regardless of the nature of that speech, then you’re a Russian apologist and stooge.

It’s pretty simple: speech that displays mistrust, dislike, or hate for the inherent traits of a people is bigotry. Speech that displays mistrust, dislike, or hate for ideals and actions is just disagreement/politics.

It’s not impossible. It’s actually pretty simple. You just don’t give it access to credentials or resources or sensitive information of any kind. Does that make them basically useless? Yep. But then you don’t create massive security risks and legal liabilities with gross negligence either, so… gotta weigh those things against each other.

Refusing to defend yourself is a matter of choice and I have no moral issue with you taking an ass kicking without fighting back if you so choose. Refusing to defend innocents when you are capable, though, is morally reprehensible and makes you as culpable as the one attacking them. While you’re taking your ass kicking, pacifists, I’ll be there doing what I can to prevent it from happening and making your attacker regret it.

So I can burn my rage off trying to peel all the damn with off while getting covered in sticky juice?

Depends. Intentionally omitting information in order to mislead? That’s a lie. Simply not mentioning something? Or not mentioning it because it’s embarrassing for you or someone else, because you didn’t think it was relevant, or because it’s not their business or not your business to share? Not really a lie. Not in the same way anyway.

Yeah, I do feel like early acting career Dwayne had more range. More recently he is just the rock in various settings, wardrobes and occasional wigs. It’s probably not even entirely his fault though. Presumably the producers and directors are telling him to be this way. He’s been typecast as the same stereotypical cocky macho guy over and over. And don’t get me wrong, he’s still funny sometimes. But he is still just portraying basically himself, most of the time.

John Cena and Dave Bautista can both be hilarious comedic actors. I’d give John the edge in the being the funnier of the two. But I’ve also seen Dave play serious, sweet, dramatic, even menacing. Hell he was basically all 4 of those in Knock at the Cabin, alone. Dude has got range.

Dwayne Johnson is good at playing Dwayne Johnson™.

She and my tech lead were out of office. I probably could have got in contact with them but I was new to the team, assumed the angry manager was right, that the work was urgent, and didn’t want to rock the boat. So I just did it. Today I’m far more aware of how full of shit some of the other team leaders are.

Devs missing deadline because they fucked around, or under estimated the work required and didn’t budget themselves enough time is more there fault (assuming the reason they under estimated wasn’t lack of information from management). Devs missing deadlines because someone tells them Tuesday that they need to drop everything and pick up a 5 pointer and have it done by Thursday, is management’s fault. The “unrealistic” part of the “unrealistic deadline” was the key word there.

Here is a real life example for you. Last year we had a few tasks for migrating our logs and dashboarding from Datadog to Dynatrace. We had just gotten our logs routing to Dynatrace on Wednesday, and were going to start work on migrating our dashboards (or actually rebuilding as there was no way to directly migrate them) the following sprint.

Then on Friday, I get an angry call from a manager of some other team that had some responsibility over the Datadogs licensing asking why we still have logs routing to Datadogs. She says that the license is being hard shut down on Monday and we need to be migrated already. So I had to drop everything. I had to export everything we had in Datadogs, and start manually rebuilding in Dynatrace (which uses a poorly documented proprietary query language I’d never used before), prioritizing the most important stuff for our support team before the weekend lest they fly blind starting Monday morning.

I only found out on Monday that this manager didnt know what they hell she was talking about, that we weren’t on the license being ended, and we had another month to do the migration. I was treated like a fucking champion by my own manager, who had been out of office on Friday, for getting done as much as I had in a single day, but there was no reason for it. She was misinformed from bad communication. And even if she had been correct, her lack of observation on the matter earlier and only informing us about the issue at the last minute was inexcusable. So was her anger over the situation at our team, who doesn’t fucking work for her, btw (not even sure which team she’s over), for not falling in line with a deadline we didn’t know about, or as it turned out a deadline we didn’t even have… bad management.

It’s nearly always a failure in management. In every company I’ve worked in, at some level failures come from bad leadership decisions.

Lack of communication, unrealistic deadlines, bad processes, no guardrails, no redundancy, poor/absent/too-harsh feedback, micromanaging, lack of observability, inaccessible resources, poor morale, etc. All management’s responsibility.

Can’t really be helped. I was getting a $50/mth stipend for it for about 3 years but then they turned that off.