• 5 Posts
  • 398 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 16th, 2025

help-circle

  • Yep, I get it. Think I have it, used to have a very independent tomcat living with me (he was not my pet, they were all my flatmates, one of the dogs was my brother, so you get an idea of the type of relationships going on). We got along very well, but he LOVED to play-hunt me around the apartment (he had a lot of verticality at his disposal), so much so that he became that lovable sort of annoying. He’d hop in my lap and I’d get that urge to lovingly squish his brains out when massaging his face (he also loved this=))) ).

    Or how I’d hug my first cat Maia, a very Bothered™ and aloof individual in general, giving her a tight but benign squeeze, or would hold her for a couple more seconds once she’d had enough of the touching, already!:))

    On the flipside, Ralph, the German Shepherd who was also my brother, loved doing this to me! He’d drop me to the ground, then would sit on me (he was a big boy, and I was ~30cm shorter at the time=)) ), or he’d paw me heavily when I started annoying him by pretending to ignore him, stuff like that:))) Oh! And he loved chewing mum’s hair because he knew she hated it=))))









  • Yepyep, agreed! I was referring strictly to the Three Laws as a cautionary element.

    Otherwise, I, too, think the point was to show that the only viable way to approach an equivalent or superior consciousness is as at least an equal, not as an inferior.

    And it makes a lot of sense. There’s not much stopping a person from doing heinous stuff if a body of laws would be the only thing to stop them. I think socialisation plays a much more relevant role in the development of a conscience, of a moral compass, because empathy (edit: and by this, I don’t mean just the emotional bit of empathy, I mean everything which can be considered empathy, be it emotional, rational, or anything in between and around) is a significantly stronger motivator for avoiding doing harm than “because that’s the law.”

    It’s basic child rearing as I see it, if children aren’t socialised, there will be a much higher chance that they won’t understand why doing something would harm another, they won’t see the actual consequences of their actions upon the subject. And if they don’t understand that the subject of their actions is a being just like them, with an internal life and feelings, then they wouldn’t have a strong enough* reason to not treat the subject as a piece of furniture, or a tool, or any other object one could see around them.

    Edit: to clarify, the distinction I made between equivalent and superior consciousness wasn’t in reference to how smart one or the other is, I was referring to the complexity of said consciousness. For instance, I’d perceive anything which reacts to the world around them in a deliberate manner to be somewhat equivalent to me (see dogs, for instance), whereas something which takes in all of the factors mine does, plus some others, would be superior in terms of complexity. I genuinely don’t even know what example to offer here, because I can’t picture it. Which I think underlines why I’d say such a consciousness is superior.

    I will say, I would now rephrase it as “superior/different” in retrospect.










  • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoMemes@lemmy.mlNostalgia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    As a Millenial, I can 100% say that I do not miss being young. Granted, the busted lumbar region and cranky guts aren’t fun, but the familiarity with my own body and the gained cognitive complexity are worth a helluva lot more to me.

    I do miss those contexts and how they made me feel, I miss seeing my friends carefree and jovial, and I miss drum and bass and punk gigs. But I was a moron back then, and the shit I did to myself, I wouldn’t wish on anyone else.

    No, there is one thing: I miss not needing as much sleep as I do now.