• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2024

help-circle
  • Ah yes, because you absolutely must hate and dehumanise everyone who shares a different belief to you. You aren’t allowed to speak to or be friendly to anyone who has shared shitty views in the past, because how else could we possibly know that you don’t share 100% of their opinions?

    You’re free to limit your communication to only those who share your views, if that’s what you find comfortable. But there can be many mutually-benefical reasons to befriend those who you dislike.

    Anyway, I’m about done with this conversation, as I don’t believe either of us will come out of it with a different view.

    Feel free to get the last word in if that helps you sleep easier. Seeing that you replied to a comment that’s almost a week old, I wouldn’t be surprised if you do.




  • It’s not a viral copyleft license, so you’re free to use the source code without giving anything back.

    This has pros and cons over something like GPL, but people like to circlejerk GPL and pretend it’s always the best option 100% of the time.
    For situations where you have to sign an NDA and are unable to release source code (eg; console game dev), MIT and BSD licensed projects are a godsend.


  • Sure. Lets just ignore ladybird/serenity and the positive impact Andreas is making because he didn’t accept a commit that changed a pronoun for a system account on the operating system he wrote from a ‘he’ to a ‘they’.

    And lets ignore that it’s been changed since. People ‘never’ change, so lets fuck up their entire career and public image for life.

    Yeah no thanks.

    If you think that comment outweighs all the positive impacts Andreas is making, that’s your prerogative. I’m not interested in holding everyone up to such high expectations.

    If that makes me a simp in your eyes, so be it.


  • If you read the commit, you would see it was referring to a built-in non-human account.
    In no way did he assume the gender of any people, so who cares if he referred to a built-in account of his operaring system as ‘he’ instead of ‘they’?
    A more accurate description would have been ‘it’.

    As somebody who also identifies as LGBT, I don’t want or need your permission to feel anything.
    I don’t feel guilty for not participating in the cancel culture of the internet.


  • The guy literally created javascript. It shouldn’t be a surprise that somebody who’s developing a web browser holds some amount of respect for him.

    We could argue about this all day, but neither of us are Andreas, so we shouldn’t be assuming his beliefs based on a few interactions on social media.

    None of this should get in the way of the web browser’s success anyway, because it’s not relevant to the project.









  • Ah, gotcha.
    Just researched a bit and noticed it’s an official term used by the UN.

    It just sounds a little weird, as somebody from a southern nation that this doesn’t seem to apply to.

    China is also in the northern hemisphere, so it also seems strange that it’s called ‘global south’.

    Something like ‘low economic’ would have made a lot more sense to me, but I guess ‘global south’ is the official term.



  • I don’t think that’s guaranteed to be true.

    A very old email of mine which I haven’t used in many years was in the breach.
    None of my other email addresses were in there, so it’s highly unlikely that I was affected by this malware in the last decade.
    That email has been in many other breaches however, so I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody who had access to an old dump was infected.
    My money’s on some random skid who downloaded an old database dump and got infected when they downloaded some bad warez.

    Either that, or this includes credentials from people who had the malware 15+ years ago.


  • phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonesponsor rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you piss me off on a regular basis by interrupting what I’m doing with your spam, at least make it entertaining in some way.
    Don’t force some scripted talking points on every content creator, give them free reign to provide their opinion about your product.

    I would be 100x more interested in your product if I saw an objective review from somebody who I knew was being honest.

    But if they only pay people to say good things about their product, I see that as the company admitting that their product is shit, because they’re too scared to allow anyone to say it is.