DAMMIT ALL TO HELL!

…This must be DEI’s fault.

No, stop! You wouldn’t!

They make themself a sandwich with what you have left, eat it, and leave. You get a Venmo payment for the cost of a loaf of bread and sandwich ingredients later.

Truly, the good version.

This is weird take on an op-ed. OP didn’t alter the title. The only ways I can conceive of a headline being “misleading” is when it declares a falsity (this doesn’t; it’s an opinion) or doesn’t match the content of the titled text (this doesn’t; it matches the text).

Yeah, force them to fund with their own money a marketing campaign with specified outreach or certain length to specified media (TV, internet, print, etc) for a specified amount of time that lists what they said and what they were wrong about.

I find it as funny as the original post

I wouldn’t even really call this recursion. This is closer to a wrapper around the enjoy function to set variables so that “enjoy” doesn’t throw an error.