

However, a law introduced on March 28 last year by emergency decree states that …
That’s where the discussion should have ended. Fascists love passing consequential laws by decree don’t they?


However, a law introduced on March 28 last year by emergency decree states that …
That’s where the discussion should have ended. Fascists love passing consequential laws by decree don’t they?


deleted by creator


In the meantime China invests in the electric future. Turns out stupidity is not an American monopoly.


They don’t have a pro-russia stance.
Also, one must distinguish between soft and hard euroscepticism. Being against the fiscal-conservative monstrosity that the EU has become is not the same as being against the idea of Europe per se.


I would use the word “indignant” rather than “angry” to signal constructive anger, that is not about venting steam but about changing structures.


We need more tech unions and tech coops.


They will rehire for less. The AI hype is just a wage suppression scheme.


Excellent article. Good to see parts of the European centre-left stirring.
Cypriot Greek


The moment the US used the NATO deterrent as trade leverage, that ship sailed.


Among the blind the one-eyed man is king.
It’s a private solution to a social problem, so by that definition antisocial. We need better and more humane schools for every child, not people retreating to private cocoons.
We need the ambition to completely rethink schooling, as part of deep social reform: https://jacobin.com/2020/06/red-vienna-children-childcare-public-health


deleted by creator


Oh no, a country that takes a moral stand on one thing is not a completely moral country on every other respect?! How dare they!



Iranians are not a monolithic bloc. Bizarre eh?


Are they being used?


Your claim is not uncontroversially factual. I am not going to argue history with you, only say this: if that’s the case, any party wanting to initiate war, should get a Security Council resolution under Article 42. Without that, sit the fuck down.


So what? We should still stand for international law.
It’s restricting access to nationality by emergency decree. Ask any European with a memory of the 20th century why that’s as classic fascist as it gets.
Whether Italy has or doesn’t have “too loose” laws, should not be something an emergency decree should decide. It’s something that should be debated democratically, with public consultation and input from all those concerned, including of course the Diaspora because, guess what, they’re citizens. Then there should be an actual vote in parliament and the senate and if it touches on constitutional rights, it should pass the threshold of constitutional reform.
That’s what democracies do. Fascists pass emergency decrees.