MEPs have sharply criticized the plan. “Our fear is that the implementation of our laws and standards will be called into question by American companies,” criticizes Green MEP Sergey Lagodinsky, for example. “If this is confirmed, it would be nothing less than a capitulation to the pressure and intimidation tactics of the Trump administration.” The EU Commission repeatedly emphasizes that it does not want to change its regulations due to US pressure. However, some of the recently proposed changes in digital legislation, particularly to the AI Act and the General Data Protection Regulation, primarily benefit US companies that are already dominant in the market.

  • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Member the vaccine sms scandal. She’s still there. She’s selling us for personal gain. GET RID OF URSULA NOW!!!

  • smeg@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    14 hours ago

    MEPs: generally US-skeptical

    Council: mixed opinions on the US, by issue

    EU Commission: follows the US’ lead on everything

    Shouldn’t the Commission be taking at least some of its cues from elected leaders?

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      EU commission is where EU politicians are sent by their parties when they are too corrupt and/or unpopular in their own country. It‘s by design.

      • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        As far as I’m concerned, the Commission is nominated by the Council, and elected by the Parliament. Parliament can force resignation, if necessary, by a two-thirds majority vote.

        If Europe is to remain European, we must be able to fend for ourselves, being fully independent from the US, yet making sure the US depends on us.

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Trump has made it illegal for states to regulate AI.

    Anybody who is wanting to be “collaborating” with Trump on regulating for safety, or for economic-safety … is delusional/incompetent.

    Stand your ground, XOR you’re being … harvested, as prey.

    _ /\ _

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, this.

      If there’s a race for AI (debatable), the US wins because of its lack of regulation. We should not even want to compete.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    There’s the old management addage a"you’re better off having someone with you in the tent pissing out, than having them outside the tent pissing in". HOWEVER, the ego, power and control of these pissers is far beyond the usual parameters for that practical guidance.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The problem is if they’re already in the tent, and are still pissing in. Then keeping them in just gives them reach.

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Unfortunately, this doesn’t account for the US shitting in the tent.

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If I could give you 10 upvotes for this most suitable update to the adage, I would!

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Its quite an old adage, I think. Pissing in or out of tents isn’t typical management language