• adarza@piefed.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    not “motorola” (as in the mobile phone company that’s now part of lenovo, or the old cable box/modem company which is owned by arris), but rather a licensee of the name and trademarks for certain networking products… “premier logitech” (which has nothing to do with the computer peripherals company), which is owned by one of those buyout/“investment” firms “tide rock”.

    i wouldn’t expect a thing out of them, especially support for gear designed, made or sold prior to tide rock’s ownership (acquired in 2024).

    • KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s the neat thing about this: If you license out your name, your name is on the device. Those licensees profit from your name, from your brand. If you license out your name to some shit company, you totally deserve that everybody does think that you are some shit company

  • Arcden@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve been really happy with buying a ~$200 mini PC and putting OPNsense on it. You just have to make sure it has two Ethernet ports. OpenWRT is another great option if you don’t have the money for that.

      • Quantumantics@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        From a quick look at the documentation, if the hardware has WiFi capability you can configure OPNsense to be an access point as well. Personally, I keep the two separate: I have a small N200-based box as my OPNsense router and a separate access point running OpenWRT for the wifi devices on my network.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I can’t find anything that doesn’t bottleneck my available bandwidth of 2Gb/s. I’ve looked, they get expensive after 1Gb/s speed. Couldn’t find anything mini PCs that can do it.

          • Duallight@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I have 2 Gb/s down using opnsense on a n150 mini pc. The one I got has 2 x 2.5gb ports. I don’t have too many devices, but I’ve never had issues getting that full download speed. During downloads where I hit my full speed, it hits about 30% usage. During normal usage like games/streaming/web browsing I don’t see above 10% usage.

            • Duallight@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I have the same 2Gb/s speed at my place. Its $10 more a month than 1Gb/s, making it easy to justify. I have no need for it besides bragging rights haha

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That sounds really cool. Any idea for a low powered (as in doesn’t draw a lot of power) OPNsense option?

      • EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        for a miini PC I recomend the M720q from Lenovo … it’s kind of overkill but it has a PCIE slot which means you can add a network card inside the original case and because it’s 16x you can go up to 10G if you wanted to.

        I add external 2.5G cards on my other models via the USB3.0 ports but it’s messy and then I have to setup LACP on the switch

      • EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        how low are we talking? I run a homelab with mini pc’s and pi

        The raspberry pi runs at 3-9W each mini pc runs at 25-65w

        Beware tho … open sense is not stable on ARM, and requires some hacking around to work

      • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Any tiny/mini/micro systen, get one second hand from EBay, get the Allstate insurance option in case it turns out to be a dudd, and slap opnsense on that thing. Most of their energy pull will be sub 15w, many even sub 10w.

      • kalpol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You don’t need much. A raspberry pi3, or similar, with two ports will do it. 4GB memory is way more than enough even if you’re loading all the pfblocker block lists, and 1GB will do it if you aren’t.

        And it really is nice. You get to do all sorts of cool networking stuff.

      • Fijxu@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        A NanoPI with OpenWRT (there is a variant that NanoPIs have that is called FriendlyWRT, but don’t use that, it sucks), they have an ARM CPU so the power usage is low. My NanoPI R5C can reach up to 600Mbit/s (up/down) with SQM enabled (Smart Queue Management, to keep your latency down on high network usage), and 800Mbit/s with something called Hardware offloading.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Technically any x86 PC with the ability to have two separate Ethernet ports would work, but unless you plan on grabbing a NetPC from the 2000s/2010s (which will have dogshit processors and probably no expansion slots for the second Ethernet port), you might be out of luck.

        Although if there is an ARM based version of the software (or if you could run it through a compatibility layer like FEX somehow), there’s tons of low power devices that could be repurposed.

  • Thomas@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Just confirms my experience that whenever “there is an app” for a device, it is a red flag as the device’s ecosystem is fragile: when the vendor looses interest in maintaining app or servers, your device turns into a brick. Plus, those apps demand suspicious permissions like access to the address book or the ability to make phone calls.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I absolutely hate when networking equipment forces you to use an app to set it up, and the app doesn’t do anything that a website couldn’t do.

      I encountered this with some solar equipment from Enphase (IQ Gateway, which all the inverters connect to). The installer had to set it up using wifi and an “installer app” before I could connect it via Ethernet cable or access the (local!) web UI.

      On the flip side, I have to give Enphase a shout out for having a fully-featured local web API running on the device itself. I’ve had Home Assistant polling it every second for years (to pull data about solar generation per panel, total power consumption, grid import/export, etc) and haven’t had issues. With so much stuff being cloud-reliant, it was a good surprise.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I absolutely hate when networking equipment forces you to use an app to set it up, and the app doesn’t do anything that a website couldn’t do.

        but the website wouldnt demand 87 permissions and have the ability to silently upload all your contacts and god knows what else to a secret server for advertisement and identification/tracking purposes.

        Which is why every company uses apps… even if those apps are just a website wrapped in a app container. because you are the product. not the device you are using.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Depends on what the app does. If required I don’t want it, if it’s optional features I would never even touch then ehh whatever.

      My oven has an app, don’t care what it does and will never use it.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        if it’s optional features I would never even touch then ehh whatever.

        Until they push a software update to your device to force using the app for basic features…

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s basically what the Eero line of routers does, you can’t configure it without the app, and there’s no web UI.

        I’m still more confident in Eero than Motorola to not fuck it up, yet I returned that shit back and bought a GL.iNet instead.

        • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          My fiber install last year came with a “free” eero router, I sent it back.

          My fiber install this year came with one, this time I refused to let them install it.

        • scytale@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Lol I have almost the same experience. I tried Eero. Never mind that it had literally only one LAN port. You also had to do everything on a mobile app, without any options to modify stuff under the hood. It was also detecting phantom devices and dropping my actual devices from wifi. When I contacted support, I discovered during troubleshooting they had live visibility of my network. I switched to a basic, traditional Netgear router after that, and now I’m using a GL.Inet (openwrt) router as well.

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Even worse is that you can’t even split the 2.4GHz and 5GHz into different SSIDs.

            Surely easier for the average person, but it sucks if you have some stubborn devices that tend to prefer 2.4GHz over 5GHz for no good reason.

  • WFH@lemmy.zip
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I would never buy a such a critical piece of equipment if it depended on an app. I’ve seen too many devices being rendered useless or crippled when their app disappears or worse, forces a subscription model. Meanwhile, I SSH into my Mikrotik router, as the gods intended.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      never thought I’d see the day where someone would say “I saw what happened to all the other stupid devices that did X, so I’m never buying a device that does X”.

      But it seems there are people out there who are capable of learning… rare as it may be.

      Thats a nice gentle breath across the last dying ember of hope I had.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Holy shit I would take a JTAG without header pins over whatever the fuck this is.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If they don’t add this, you gotta pull out the soldering iron before you can communicate with your device.

        Still easier to maintain than a Motorola router.

        • QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You just barely replied to the wrong comment.

          You replied to the person asking what JTAG is instead of replying to the person who didn’t know what these “app connected only” Motorola devices are using.