• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “What transpired is not reflective of who I am, the values I hold, or the way I was raised,” Henderson said.

    And yet. Your words fall pretty flat Mr Henderson when your actions are telling a very different story.

    • BeUnique@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Would he have said anything at all or apologized if he wasn’t called out? I doubt it.

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    “Now that the conference is over, the damage is done, and these people no longer pose a threat, I’d like to express how sorry I am and hope we can all move past this.”

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Did they lose their positions? I haven’t read anything indicating that, just that they weren’t allowed back into the conference.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      They never lost their jobs. They were banned from the conference which is something hard to put a damage number on. They probably won’t sue the org because they remain part of it and are unlikely to want to take any real money from it that can otherwise continue going to helping diabetes research and advocacy. Maybe they can get a future conference paid for. They’re all relatively established in their careers.

      • davad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        The easiest damages would be the cost of attending (conference tickets, travel, hotel). If there was reputational damage, that’s harder to prove but the conference could be liable for that. Seeing how many vocal supporters they have, reputational damage would be hard to prove

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So often this sort of thing makes sense because it’s conduct or disruption that are reasons they got kicked out. The topic could be <insert whatever>, but a clickbait title will latch onto that topic if it could be edgy…

    The scientists were ejected for handing out copies of an April editorial

    …yup. Well, obviously this isn’t one of those times.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    “What transpired is not reflective of who I am, the values I hold, or the way I was raised,” [ADA CEO] Henderson said. “I will work hard to bring our community back together to build on the progress we have collectively made for those affected by diabetes.”

    Jesus, he sounds like a pro athlete who got arrested for drunk driving.