Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoCopyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software?fsfe.orgexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down12 cross-posted to: programming@programming.devopensource@programming.dev
arrow-up1104arrow-down1external-linkCopyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software?fsfe.orgPierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square24linkfedilink cross-posted to: programming@programming.devopensource@programming.dev
minus-squareEndymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up39·1 day agoThe short answer: Legally, maybe. Ethically, no.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 hours agoIt’s absolutely ethical to ignore copyrights.
minus-squaret3rmit3@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-212 hours agoI don’t know, Unlicense is still an OSS license, and imo that’s what vibe code should mostly be.
minus-squareCarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·24 hours ago Ethically, no. Sam Altman: Hold my beer.
The short answer: Legally, maybe. Ethically, no.
It’s absolutely ethical to ignore copyrights.
I don’t know, Unlicense is still an OSS license, and imo that’s what vibe code should mostly be.
Sam Altman: Hold my beer.