• kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In the original they are 3 brothers and begin with equal means given to them by their mother, fwiw.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think I’ve ever heard an origin story for them. It’s always been, “Once upon a time, there were three little pigs.”

      When it comes to stuff like this, I don’t think it matters so much what the original authorial intent was, more how the story has been transmitted in pop culture.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        No telling that I’ve ever heard starts with three little pigs having wealth disparity and only one being able to afford bricks due to generational wealth.

        The implication of the story is that they are all equal and one works harder than the others. Which is a real life lesson. Regardless of your views on systemic wealth allocation, at any socio-economic class, hard work is still a virtue.

        I feel like you’re seeing the lesson you want to see.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Stories can have multiple meanings, even to the same person, and different meanings can be the emotional drive behind sharing the story, even if they are never explicitly stated.

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Sure, and people can read whatever they want into a text even if it’s not there.

            Do you remember the phrase “to each according to their need, from each according to their ability”? Socialism and communism has always valued hard work. Pushing the value of hard work is not a capitalist conspiracy, it was literally most of the messaging of the Soviet Union.

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              An immediate example is what I’m taking from your comments despite, “I am media-illiterate” not being present in the text.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think it matters so much what the original authorial intent was, more how the story has been transmitted in pop culture.

        See also: the words of Jesus vs how America has transmitted them in pop culture.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Jesus’ words have been supporting totalatarian structures since 400 AD at least, but, yeah, at least those people had the excuse of illiteracy and lack of access to the words of the Son of God. You have to be pretty damn incurious to swallow evangelicalist politics.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Jesus’ words have been supporting totalatarian structures since 400 AD at least, but, yeah, at least those people had the excuse of illiteracy and lack of access to the words of the Son of God. You have to be pretty damn incurious to swallow evangelicalist politics.