• Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Aren’t the wealthy in Idiocracy also, well, idiots?

    I thought the thing was everyone was an idiot

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, but it is because the rich people in modern times didn’t have kids while poor people were, even having significant resources given to them to allow them to survive and reproduce.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t know if they were portrayed as “rich”, but just a couple that was very careful and considered about everything. A clean and organized and empty house being a consequence of that. While trying to fit children in “properly” they never found the time.

        Certainly the two preserved people were not rich.

        Also, I don’t think the message was that “poor people” should not reproduce " as your eugenics claim asserts, think the takeaway would be that folks should find some happy medium, the people let planning and anxiety get too in the way of having the children they wanted, and the other example needed at least some more responsible sensibilities.

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          We live in a society. We depend on each other to keep that society functional.

          We resent the effort it takes to maintain life, because that prevemts time being spent on the less.mundane stuff.

          Humanity built rules and morals to keep us on track, but nature doesnt loose - it reroutes the river. Controlled breeding looses out to hornyness. And Entropy eventually topples the sand castles of humanity. Like giant avalanches of garbage.