24
Looking for Privacy-Oriented Open-Source Android Browsers I’m looking for a
privacy-focused, open-source Android browser. Here are some options I’ve found:
* IronFox [https://gitlab.com/ironfox-oss/IronFox] * recommended by LibreWolf *
Fennec [https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.mozilla.fennec_fdroid/] * no repo *
Waterfox [https://github.com/BrowserWorks/Waterfox] * Vanadium
[https://github.com/GrapheneOS/Vanadium] * only available on GrapheneOS
[https://github.com/GrapheneOS] * better security * iceraven
[https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser] * most stars *
https://lemmy.world/u/Thetimefarm@lemm.ee [/u/Thetimefarm@lemm.ee]
[https://lemmy.world/u/Thetimefarm@lemm.ee] - As far as I know ironfox supports
any extensions normal firefox mobile does, but neither give you access to the
full full extensions store. Iceraven is the only mobile browser I know of that
lets you use all the extensions that you can on desktop firefox. * bromite
[https://github.com/bromite/bromite] * no longer maintained * Bromite has a
fingerprint randomization and Vanadium doesn’t. But Vanadium has better security
if you use Graphene. So yeah, for privacy Bromite might be better * cromite
[https://github.com/uazo/cromite] * Bromite fork * brave [https://brave.com/] -
controversial * duckduckgo [https://github.com/duckduckgo/Android] Is there any
other browser out there that fits this criteria? Is there an even better choice?
I’m particularly interested in ones that focus on privacy. — UPDATE: iceraven vs
ironfox
https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/1lkagoz/iceraven_vs_ironfox_firefox_fork_for_android/
[https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/1lkagoz/iceraven_vs_ironfox_firefox_fork_for_android/]
> I use both! Ironfox is hardened to improve security as best as possible for a
gecko based android browser and focuses mainly on preventing fingerprinting,
similar to mullvad’s browser. Because of these extra privacy protections some
websites will be more prone to break or render goofy on ironfox, but luckily I
haven’t ran into that issue yet. > > Iceraven just strips out mozilla’s tracking
and adds tons of extra extensions and customizability, but doesn’t include the
extra security hardening or fingerprint protection like ironfox does. > > Both
devs are very good at keeping up with releases imo. > > So if you really need
airtight fingerprint prevention, or want extra security hardening, I’d go with
ironfox. Also just a note, even with ironfox’s hardening, it’s still not as
secure as a chromium based browser. Some people have very strong opinions on the
gecko vs chromium security debate so I’m just pointing that out as a disclaimer.
If you’re gonna be treading into websites where there’s a significant risk of
picking up something nefarious in the background, stick with a chromium based
browser for those sites as a precaution. Just my 2 cents. — EDIT: in terms of
popularity, privacy and functionality I guess the best choices are iceraven
(based on firefox) as it has most stars on github and cromite (based on
chromium) as brave is controversial — Solved Questions I know that Brave is a
bit controversial, but If Brave does something behind our backs wouldn’t we be
able to know it since all the source code is out there? If it has some features
we don’t like can’t we simply modify the source code? @slackness > re: open
source In theory: yes. In practice: maybe. It’ll probably eventually be caught
by some researcher but unlike popular belief all open source code bases are not
constantly being audited by the community. A random person can’t just read Brave
source code for all platforms and accurately gauge if they’re doing something
nefarious. It is very easy to hide stuff in code or misuse a protocol for evil
purposes, etc. > > You can modify the source code but as evident by the fact
that there’s no Brave fork with crypto removed (there was one but their branding
was too similar to Brave’s so they got sued), it’s not an easy feat to maintain
that. — few questions - What is the difference between IronFox, Fennec, Waterfox
and iceraven? > As far as I know ironfox supports any extensions normal firefox
mobile does, but neither give you access to the full full extensions store.
Iceraven is the only mobile browser I know of that lets you use all the
extensions that you can on desktop firefox.
would you say this one is much better than iron fox in terms of privacy and functionality?
privacy - in my opinion that depends more on your behaviour and the installed extensions than the browser.
functionality - a little bit, but of course that matters only if you need any of the listed features (see link). The big one is the additional extensions/plugins that you can install.
Thanks a lot!