• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    it is a requirement if you want to do that without oppessing brown people elsewhere.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      the important thing is not socialism: it’s a government that deals with negative externalities

      socialism tends to do better at that simply because often it often does better at long-term planning (but that’s not a given either), but capitalism without corporate bullshit, stock markets, etc (ie actual ownership over a business rather than just ownership over a vague thing where you’re only concerned with line goes up not long term business health) has pretty much the same drivers: long term sustainability and this holding others to account for their negative externalities