• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess nobody ever taught you that rule about not using the word(s) you’re trying to define, in the definition itself?

    • Luc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      And “nobody taught you” to attack the argument instead of the person

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Are we seriously gonna play the “but what do these words actually mean” card for “illegal” and “immigrant?” Kinda stupid ass takes that give credibility to online age verification. My comment wasn’t a serious definition, it was deliberately drawing attention to the absurdity of asking to define a phrase with a total of two words both of which are highly specific, unambiguous and descriptive of the very thing they mean. At the point where phrases like this need to be rigorously explained and defined, we’re in a “learning the language for the first time and doesn’t actually know what words mean” scenario

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Stupid Ass Takes” is Lemmy’s catchphrase. I swear this place makes reddit look tame sometimes.

        • Fleur_@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Usually the free market place of ideas ensures that the ideas, values and knowledge of all people are refined and weighed against each other. This naturally elevates and expands collective knowledge.

          On Lemmy however there are only bad ideas so it works to ensure that everyone is on an equal playing field of truly intellectually deficient opinions. And I’m here for it. Can’t have fun on Reddit like you can on Lemmy.