Don’t give people any ideas, I’m sure some would commute in a semi if they thought it made them more manly.

You’d probably also need infrastructure built for autonomous cars, which might not happen.

Same, during the blackout for me.

Yeah I’m familiar with Ariane 6. It costs almost double what SpaceX changes external customers per launch, not even counting that their internal rate would be even lower. Plus you’d need more launches since the payload capacity is lower. You’d end up paying 3x or more the cost. At that point, why not just buy falcon 9 launches? Otherwise it seems like there’d be very little way to compete.

What will they launch on? Star Link is barely feasible because they can launch at cost on falcon 9.

Thanks! Sounds like limiting risk from the California bill is a plausible reason, but it isn’t confirmed.

Legal Definitions of “Selling Data” Under the CCPA Are Broad: As noted above, the CCPA’s definition encompasses many data-sharing practices that may not align with common understanding of “selling data”.[16] Even if Mozilla was not directly selling user data, its search partnerships, telemetry data sharing, & sponsored content could have been interpreted as data sales if Mozilla received any financial benefit from them, all of which were actions that Mozilla has already been transparent & upfront about.

Mozilla’s Search Engine Deals Could Be Considered Data Sales: As mentioned earlier, these partnerships could legally qualify as data sales under the CCPA definition, despite being an existing part of Mozilla’s business model that consumers are already aware of.[1]

Sponsored Content in Firefox’s New Tab Page Involves Data Exchange: Mozilla dReferencesisplays sponsored content and ads on the Firefox New Tab page, which may involve user interaction data being shared with advertisers.[11] Even if the data is anonymized, the CCPA considers certain types of aggregated data as personal information if it can be linked back to users.[16]

Do they share location data without asking though? Google has an incentive to exaggerate.

The story I heard was that by of California’s definition of selling data, doing anything with user data that could benefit the company was considered selling data. So they updated their FAQ to be in line with that definition. But I could be wrong, if someone could point me to a good article I’d appreciate it.

I’ve found the computers are fine.

https://slrpnk.net/c/solarpunk

!solarpunk@slrpnk.net

Lucky, Lemmy let’s you edit titles!

Is it just that they’re launching more, so they have more irregularities?

From the launch statistics booster landing section of the wiki, looks like they’re in line with previous booster losses, as long as they don’t have too many more this year. But they aren’t above average yet.

What problems then?

What falcon 9 launch failures have there been? I don’t see any recent ones in the wiki.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches

I think it’s for Juan

I don’t know, going on the juice to try to out run a nuke with PDCs blazing away is pretty cool.

As I understand it, profit is price minus costs. Profit margin is the percentage of the cost that is profit. So I don’t see how they’re getting more profit out than the total price? Are they counting extra value from selling or training on the prompt data?

If it’d cost less than say 2x what it’d save, I’d say it’s beneficial. Making it obvious that corruption isn’t going to work has value, but no need to do really extensive audits just to get the last 0.1% of mistakes/fraud.

Do you have charge/discharge voltage curves for each? I’d imagine if they look practically identical it’d be fine. The issue I think is that the curves for LFP are a lot flatter than NMC.