Admin of Europe Pub
- Lemmy: @tfm@europe.pub
- PieFed: @tfm@piefed.europe.pub
- 23 Posts
- 315 Comments
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
391·3 months agoI’m pretty happy with engagement in the Fediverse.
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
2·3 months agoAwesome!
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
21·3 months agoTrue
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
24·3 months agoLemmy has about 40,000 monthly active users. Lemmy.world accounts for about 15,500 of that. That’s about 40%.
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
8·3 months agoThis site currently measures the concentration of user data for active users: in the Fediverse, this data is on servers (also known as instances); in the Atmosphere, it is on the PDSes that host users’ data repos. All PDSes run by the company Bluesky Social PBC are aggregated in this dataset, since they are under the control of a single entity. Similarly, mastodon.social and mastodon.online are combined as they are run by the same company.
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
11·3 months agoTrue
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
472·3 months agoSo why does everyone keep referring to Bluesky as decentralized or even comparable to the fediverse
They call it marketing, I call it propaganda.
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
16·3 months agoPDSes only store user data. These are full instances that can be used to browse the network. The idea is to make your account really yours. Bluesky is hosting most of them. But there are some people who do it on their own.
But bluesky controls much more important components in the network, namely the Relay and AppView.
If Bluesky decides to cut off your PDS you are pretty much alone.
Bluesky is pretty much a centralized platform like Twittler.
tfm@europe.pubOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse.English
32·3 months agoI suppose PDS instances are included: https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds
Let’s not forget that’s devices sold per year. If you replace all iphones, that’s about 3 billion I think. This number looks a lot different.
Comparing this to global energy production is not really helpful, in my opinion.
Let’s do the math. Apple sells about about 200 million devices a year. Let’s say they remove the charging port and completely rely on wireless charging, which isn’t completely unrealistic. If we use your 30wh this would result in 6.96GWh or lost energy every single day. With 150wh it would be 34.8GWh.
If that’s not significant for one dumb decision I don’t know what is.
Wireless charging is a waste of energy
tfm@europe.pubto
Technology@lemmy.world•Bluesky blocks Mississippi users over age verification lawEnglish
9·4 months agoThat would be too obvious
Data shouldn’t be organized hirarchically.
tfm@europe.pubto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Upvotes and downvotes are public information on Lemmy
1·4 months agoThat may be true but it makes the Lemmyverse much more robust in the long term.
I don’t care if I have to subscribe to multiple similar communities or see some posts multiple times, as long as not one or just a few people control the whole discourse.












Why would you need sunlight on demand?