it’s getting to the point where I notice people say it a lot, especially IRL now for whatever reason recently.

And for clarity I’m not in research or anything, so these people just mean ‘LLM/image gen’, not utilities like OCR or (usually not) transcription.

Some have argued it’s just more efficient (which I can kind of get), while others think you’re actively hindering your intelligence somehow.

On the first point:

I’ve tried it occasionally to see how it compares to my own skill, and while it produces a functional result, it’s always very derivative work to the point where you can find things with the exact same names of other ‘public’ (but not libre) works, and often isn’t the ideal solution to what it targets. So I can see how you can get things out of it, but it never felt really that profound to me.

But for the second… isn’t this supposed to be the tool for people to do things they aren’t experienced in? If anything, you probably need to be able to understand how to write pertaining to the task so the token probabilities are biased toward writing from that area.

And even then, if all you end up doing is prompting AI, then wouldn’t you ultimately serve no purpose outside of being glorified QA?

I guess I’m trying to figure out what exactly non-users would be ‘falling behind’ in that affects them more than those who use AI?

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I see it with ADAS.

    It appears that the more Advanced Driver Assistance Systems a vehicle has, the less competent the driver is and the more likely it is that they will not react correctly (or at all) in an emergency situation.

    ANCAP and ENCAP are realising this now and their ratings are no longer weighted so heavily on ADAS.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, this has been a long problem in government agencies here.

      There was a political decision made years and years ago, that in-house expertise was too expensive and that they would hire consultants when they needed specific skills.

      That works only as long as you have the in-house skills to determine what external skills are needed.

      Same here, without the skills to do the work, you don’t have the skills to correctly evaluate the work of an LLM.