• Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    now we have fucking start putting signs to ban recording glasses too? fucking hell just be a decent human being so we don’t have to drown in rules.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Generally recording at gyms is already prohibited, but this was the gym manager using them.

      • Avicenna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah but soon users will start using them too and when confronted they will say they didn’t know and then owners will have to start putting up signs because there is always some people that just lack the basic amount of common sense that is required to grasp this (on top of those who disobey it with bad faith).

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      One of my pi-hole lists is blocking it. Can’t say I’m upset with that. It’s kinda rare a seemingly normal looking link gets blocked but it’s a good warning it’s a dodgy site.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    8 hours ago

    While the glasses are definitely a problem, this seems to be more about the general manager just being an utter cunt.

    “At this point, my friend’s husband’s getting frustrated, and he’s like, ‘You need to give me my ID back,’” Marilyn said. “The GM threatens to call the cops on my friend’s husband and threatens to ban him.”

    “OK, call the cops.” is what they should have said.

    which resulted in her considering other gyms entirely.

    Considering!?

    • seathru@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “OK, call the cops.” is what they should have said.

      If you are ever in a situation that you need the cops; it is almost always in your best interest to be the one who calls. Cops are dumb AF and will blindly believe the reporting party unless things are extremely obvious otherwise.

  • twisted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t think newsbreak expects people to actually move past the headline and read the article because most of it is incoherent bullshit.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m not sure how the glasses provide protection. Seems like corporate must get a constant stream of complaints and accusations about this bozo but recordings of him being such an ass would not really be much of a defense.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Cause the manosphere likes to tell every man that if they haven’t been falsely accused of something, it’s just a matter of time. So if they record everyone constantly, then they can “prove” that it was just a misunderstanding.

      Of course, if the accusation is that they’re been a creep and recording people without consent…

  • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The gym already has security cameras, the fuck does he mean the glasses are for his “protection”?

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He means like a condom. If he doesn’t record women at the gym for some spank bank material, he might get someone pregnant.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’d imagine that in that job—if you’re not a perfectly fit young dude or a woman—there’s a lot of accusations of “being a creep.”

      Imagine you’re the guy working that job and someone complains that there’s a mess in the women’s locker room. What do you do?

      You ask a woman if there’s anyone else in there, maybe shout that you’re coming in to clean it up, etc. Then you walk into the women’s locker room and someone—anyone—sees a man walking into the women’s locker room. BAM! Instant creep status.

      Are Meta’s glasses the answer? Fuck no! But I understand the “I need protection from accusations” argument.

      What’s the alternative? Cameras in the locker room? Hidden cameras?

      The guy probably thought that the glasses were big, ugly, and obvious (because they are) so no one could complain that they didn’t know they could be recorded in that guy’s presence.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What about a simple camera watching the floor with automatic deletion of data after 48 hours? Why should fucking META of all companies and the garbage manager have unlimited access to this material instead of being stored in a way that doesn’t fuck all clients over?

        Why do you have such insecurites that need a fucking all encompassing nanny in form of an abusive GM?

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I assume he doesn’t actually have access to the business cameras because he’s just an employee of a much larger organization.

          Example: I work for a large organization and I do not have access to any cameras anywhere. I wouldn’t even know how to request it!

          Also, the recordings need to last a lot longer than 48h. A month makes more sense.

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            How long recordings are stored is a point of discussion - i say for everything involving the police, when taking their overblown budgets into account, 48-72 hours are plenty.

            And if this fuckwit does not have access, that’s how it should be, and that’s the same reason why he shouldn’t have any private recordings too (if we ignore that Meta is using that data for whatever they want)

            • Riskable@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              That’s way too short. Because if the point is to protect yourself from accusations, you need to be able to go back in time to whatever the company/courts would say is a reasonable amount of time (and match that policy).

              1. A week after the event someone reports something.
              2. Corporate investigates and doesn’t tell the employee for a week or two. Maybe even longer.
              • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                If the police walks in to secure evidence, i am sure that you can implement a mechanism to freeze the current state of the storage. If it is public knowledge that businesses are not allowed by law to store surveillance data longer than a week, this will also be reflected in peoples behavior.

      • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Imagine you’re the guy working

        Idk, An employee entering whatever gender toilets to clean it isn’t gonna be seen as creepy imho, unless they’re being actively creepy, like by recording videos with creepers’ glasses. I mean, menployees clean women’s toilet all the time and womenployees also clean men toilets.

        I can’t believe many if any business is currently paying gender-specific cleaners for gendered toilets. An employee would just grab that yellow rolling cleaning cart and deal with the thing and move on. It’s a scenario that happens literally everyday everywhere unless the place doesn’t clean their toilets.

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The difference here is that your typical janitorial staff will look like janitorial staff. This guy is just a generic manager (a uniform change when cleaning would be a good idea though).

          The other issue is that most businesses don’t have locker rooms; they’re just bathrooms.

          A bathroom has stalls where you can’t see them whereas a locker room will often have naked or nearly naked people just walking about.

          • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You don’t go into an opposite gender bathroom to clean without propping the door open and putting a sign up stating that it’s being cleaned. You don’t want to be in a stall cleaning something up, while someone else walks in and starts changing without noticing you in there.

            Heck, even if it’s a same gender, they often do that so they can take care of the whole job quickly without getting interrupted.

            Recording while walking around in the bathroom/locker room is never and has never been the answer to any problem that has ever existed.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I feel like stupid is consistent. Someone who is stupid will wear these glasses, and also act like the manager in this story.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “He’s like, ‘Hey, you know, what happened with my wife earlier?’ The general manager then responded, saying, ‘Do you wanna get bonk with me?’  Like, do you wanna fight?” she recalls.

    Is this what passes for a manager these days?

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I saw an article the other day about women in Spain not sunbathing topless anymore because of all the “nudify” apps and pervert glasses. Are gyms going to be next? And I mean “going to the gym”, not “working out topless”.

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have a hard time believing this story. The woman claims she brought her friend in on a guest pass but then when there’s an issue, that friend’s husband appears in the story out of nowhere and happend to be there working out at the exact same time under his own membership? The claimed over-the-top responses by the manager and the fact that she then deleted her post makes this all very fishy.