• kalman@dboft.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Wow. Bravo mapquest team. I wish they would come on here and speak to their brand renewal.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You can help too!!

      Check out DeFlock, and by all means, come join us on OpenStreetMap. It looks like about 400–500 cameras have been added in the last few days.

      If there’s anything I can personally do to help you (yes, you, reading this) get involved with OSM – even just a pep talk – I’ll do whatever I can. There are a million different ways you can help, regardless of if you’re in Paris reading the WikiHow for heisting the Louvre or stranded in the wilderness using your last five minutes of battery to browse Lemmy.

      Source: Reasonably longtime user and contributor.

      • hash@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Unfortunately I really wouldn’t trust the numbers on new cameras. In my area most are already mapped and there’s a steady stream of misidentified cameras being added. Stuff like DOT and traffic light cameras.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I think the new companies that are like Flock, but not Flock, are starting to incorporate all the cameras. Those are probably in the Flock system.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Unfortunately with that now including traffic cams they are impossible to avoid. I couldn’t even make it to a gas station without going through 3 intersections

      • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Question, because I’m not finding much information on this. Supposedly we can incorporate overlays from OSM into CoMaps that shows Flock camera locations on our routes. Would you have any information on how to do this or a resource that could show me how? Thanks in advance.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I wish I did. :(

          I’ve never heard anything about this. In fact, I’ve never heard of overlays on CoMaps generally. My only guess is that maybe the rumor is related to OsmAnd, which does let you create custom overlays given a URL source.

          I only use CoMaps on desktop, which is to say not very often, so I’m a lot less familiar with it. Sorry!

          • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            No problem. Thanks for answering. I found something saying that it does work with CoMaps by enabling surveillance poi as a custom overlay in CoMaps and to do that you import that data from openstreetmap. You’re probably right that it was for OSMand. I will try and find out more. Thanks again for answering.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is dope, BUT Mapquest is just a wrapper for OpenStreetMaps, and this is data that you get for free with OSM.

    Also, after install, Mapquest immediately asks to start tracking your behavior for targeted marketing shit.

    Mapquest probably doesn’t actually give a shit privacy or fighting authoritarians. They just want a cheap and free data set, and the cheapest thing available automatically has LPR data and doesn’t rename bodies of water to “America.”

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve heard that said a few times but I have used both and MapQuest is infinitely more accurate and usable. I tried osm first and half the addresses I typed in couldn’t be found unless it were a major city. MapQuest I have not had that problem so they either use a different data source or they amalgamate multiple sources for more functionality.

      • RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Most likely they mirror the data from OSM and then use their own search algorithm, this is what most OSM based apps do

    • tim@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Oh shit, I didn’t realize OSM had a Flock locator. Is it working as a layer in OsmAnd yet? I’ll check…

      EDIT: Nope, or at least I couldn’t find it.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    All of them or just the reported ones? Because someone discovered 100k+ undeclared cameras (or so they said) spread around.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The ones reported to OpenStreetMap.

      Mapquest is basically a wrapper for OpenStreetMaps, so they kind of get this for free.

      Also, all of the major flock reporting tools are built on OSM. So basically, if you use Mapquest, you will get data from DeFlock users.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Looks like I’m going to be paying for an app possibly for the first time ever. I’ve had the free version for a while but they’ve earned my money

    Edit: damn it crashes a lot :(

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well I’m glad somebody’s doing it because DeFlock’s app was designed by someone who doesn’t understand UX. It’s so clunky and unintuitive. Hell, the “navigation” feature doesn’t actually give you turn-by-turn directions FFS!