• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    only if you stipulate your opposition based on individuals.

    one can oppose all illegal immigrants based entirely on the legal definition of “illegal immigrant” and be ethically clear.

    moralistically… not so much.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        so you’re ethically compromised but moralistically solid.

        good place to be tbh. allows those who desperately need help to find salvation and those who have and can to follow the rules.

        • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.ukBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically. I’m also not against programmes to relieve other countries of their refugees (such as Greece) although I think such programmes should be evaluated for if we have the resources to support them and build them up into functioning members of society