I’m new as in this is my first day using lemmy. I don’t know anything about lemmy etiquette and don’t want to do anything bad
thanks and have an amazing day! also plz be kind :D
I’m new as in this is my first day using lemmy. I don’t know anything about lemmy etiquette and don’t want to do anything bad
thanks and have an amazing day! also plz be kind :D
Don’t be a dick. If you want to be negative that’s fine, but be prepared with a litany of sources.
Nobody cares about sources literally anywhere, that’s not how brains work and in fact may increase hostility in many cases. Human brains are not rational machines.
Just make sure you’re actually funny.
Just because it doesn’t work doesn’t mean we shouldn’t normalize it.
I generally agree with offering sources; I just wanted to add a funny.
Just because nobody cares doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to normalize them.
Why?
Because misinformation and disinformation are way more dangerous than anyone takes seriously; in my opinion, it could legitimately cause the end of our species. I think that being forced to at least have sources to support your assertion can help.
Andrew Wakefield says hello.
And he represents just one of hundreds of deadly misinformation campaigns in the last thirty years alone.
I’m saying when you make people who are wrong find community based on beoling wrong they get even more entrenched.
Most people can’t tell the difference between science and bullshit.
Yeah, definitely. But:
It’s a lot easier to answer the disinformation if you know where it’s coming from. Part of the thing that makes my head spin about the GOP news cycle is how even I (a chronically-online, fairly well-informed person) will have absolutely no idea where some people come up with the nonsense they come up with. Is it from their own mind? Is there some fringe community on Facebook doling out steaming dog piles of AI-generated anti-vax nonsense? Is it a legitimate outlet, and they’re just massively misunderstanding it? Knowing where it comes from can really help in combating it; even if you can’t stop the current fake news, you might be able to head the next one off before it takes root.
Sometimes just the process of needing to find a source can make people look twice. It works for me, even: if I want to write something I’m pretty sure about, and then go looking for a source, sometimes I’ll find out that that source isn’t reliable, or that it was retracted. Sometimes I’ll even find out that what I remembered was true, but it’s way better or worse. I become more media literate sourcing my facts.
most people aren’t writing papers on lemmy.
citing your sources is for academic/professional work, not casual conversation on the internet or irl.
And I’m saying it should be normalized, especially for high-emotion and controversial topics. It shouldn’t just be for academic or professional work, but for casual conversation, too. I don’t think people should necessarily be forced to post sources every time, but they should definitely be encouraged to do so when asked.
Misinformation and disinformation are an extinction-level threat for our species. I’m not exaggerating. And I think that being forced to at least have a source can help.
You’re basically saying everyone has to get PhDs and only ever talk as as if they are an academic conference. Otherwise they should shut up and not be bale to ever contribute to any conversation.
Do you not see the patent absurdity of that expectation?
Further, being an academic and have a PhD doesn’t make you less susceptible to misinformation and disinformation. I have known tons of PhDs and other highly educated professionals who believe in healing crystals, astrology, and other magical thinking nonsense.
No, I’m absolutely not saying that. I’m saying we should normalize having sources and not just blindly repeating a thing we heard.